Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Got a 'nother '03
Collapse
X
-
Drool"The answer to 1984 is 1776!" - Mahatma GandhiComment
-
MLC member.
Biden, proof that stupid people shouldn't be allowed to vote.
Dumocraps suck balls.Comment
-
can you cite a source for this info? best I can find is that NM 1903's from your rifle's time frame had the rifle's serial number stamped on the bottom of the stock in front of the swivel. not so much about drawing numbers.
here's something I found on handguard drawing numbers-
"The D28179 marked handguard was produced for both NM and non-NM M1903s in the late 1930s."
linky-http://forums.thecmp.org/showthread.php?t=63751MAGAComment
-
can you cite a source for this info? best I can find is that NM 1903's from your rifle's time frame had the rifle's serial number stamped on the bottom of the stock in front of the swivel. not so much about drawing numbers.
here's something I found on handguard drawing numbers-
"The D28179 marked handguard was produced for both NM and non-NM M1903s in the late 1930s."
linky-http://forums.thecmp.org/showthread.php?t=63751
I got my info from what is considered the bible on 1903 rifles, "The Springfield 1903 Rifles" by Lt. Col.William S. Brophy Page 62-64
From observed rifles, the drawing number on the handguard seems to be most prevalent on NM rifles produced between 1934 and 1936. The practice was discontinued after it was found that too many handguards were cracking during the stamping process. I have no doubt that a great many were bought separately and installed on various other rifles.
See post #13Nice find,,, does it have the "turtle" on the end of the barrel/muzzle ?MLC member.
Biden, proof that stupid people shouldn't be allowed to vote.
Dumocraps suck balls.Comment
-
Nice pick up, OP.Comment
-
That is interesting about the silver line on the rear sight. If it was a civilian target rifle, that makes it an even better find in my opinion. It may not make it any more valuable, but it may possibly shoot more accurately than a wartime model. I too like the fact that it still has it's original barrel.Comment
-
I'm no expert on 1903s or the english language, but doesn't the word "prevalent" in this text mean something like "commonly seen on" or something like that? I don't see how that confirms your statement about it only being seen on NM rifles.I got my info from what is considered the bible on 1903 rifles, "The Springfield 1903 Rifles" by Lt. Col.William S. Brophy Page 62-64
From observed rifles, the drawing number on the handguard seems to be most prevalent on NM rifles produced between 1934 and 1936. The practice was discontinued after it was found that too many handguards were cracking during the stamping process. I have no doubt that a great many were bought separately and installed on various other rifles.
See post #13
I'm not trying to hammer anyone here, just trying to learn something about these that I was not aware of.NRA Life Member - CRPA Life Member - NRA Certified RSO - USN Veteran
I collect Military Arms and enjoy shooting in local matches. I also collect older Lever Actions, especially those chambered in odd/old cartridges. If you have a nice old Winchester or Marlin in 25-20, 32-40, 38-55, 40-60, 45-70, etc etc, please PM me and we can work out a deal.
Originally posted by TheExpertdoucheI wasn't kidding when I said this would all be over by Xmas... Stay tuned for good news next week.Comment
-
I guess I was being a little too general. The handguards with the drawing number are seen on NM rifles that are known to be original. They have been observed on non NM rifles like mine, but on my rifle, for instance, there is no way to determine if any of the parts on it are original to the rifle AS MANUFACTURED. The hand guards and stocks with drawing numbers, are considered to be National Match pieces. You can debate semantics all you want, but I will stand by my original statement.
I hope this helps.Last edited by highpower; 02-09-2015, 2:10 PM.MLC member.
Biden, proof that stupid people shouldn't be allowed to vote.
Dumocraps suck balls.Comment
-
the question regarding NM handguards is spurious. whether or not the handguard on this rifle was only (whuch is doubtful, given the evidence) manufactured for NM rifles, this rifle is not a NM. Having a so-called NM handguard on it does not increase the value or serviceability.
actually, the value of the rifle would be improved if the owner took the line handguards with drawing numbers were used on service rifles as originally manufactured in the mid-Thirties.
additionally, during my online research of this subject I came across info that receivers in this serial range were assembled into barreled receivers for use as spare parts. given the decision in the late '20's about low-numbered receivers, such spares would have been used to replace these dangerous receivers.
whatever, "ONLY" cannot be substituted for "seems to be most prevalent".
that's not semantics, it's diction.MAGAComment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,863,438
Posts: 25,106,115
Members: 355,945
Active Members: 4,919
Welcome to our newest member, glocksource.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 7219 users online. 114 members and 7105 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 10:39 PM on 02-14-2026.

Comment