Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

1917 pep sight

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • NOTABIKER
    Calguns Addict
    • Mar 2012
    • 7635

    1917 pep sight

    When i flip up my pep sight on my 1917 eddystone it does not lock in the proper vertical position. it is slightly tilted in the forward position. the flat spring that holds it in the vertical position seems normal. the end of the spring is worn but i do not see how it is the problem.
  • #2
    Springfield45
    Senior Member
    • Jun 2008
    • 2426

    Buy a new sight spring and try it. It is in stock and less than 4 bucks. The tips of the spring may have worn off. They do get old. On mine the sight falls forward every time I shoot it.

    Comment

    • #3
      Ronin2
      Banned
      • Jan 2011
      • 5563

      "Peep sight"

      Comment

      • #4
        Enfield47
        Calguns Addict
        • Sep 2012
        • 6385

        John, I just looked at the peep sight on my P14 and it doesn't stand straight up either. Mine is tilted a couple of degrees inward toward the barrel and when I pull it back toward the buttstock it springs back to that position. Not sure if that is how they are supposed to be or not. For comparison, my Enfield No 4 Mk II and No 1 Mk V ladder sights both stand stand up at 90 degrees. I would think all Enfield's would be the same...

        Comment

        • #5
          Father Ted
          Senior Member
          • Jan 2013
          • 889

          Originally posted by NOTABIKER
          When i flip up my pep sight on my 1917 eddystone it does not lock in the proper vertical position. it is slightly tilted in the forward position. the flat spring that holds it in the vertical position seems normal. the end of the spring is worn but i do not see how it is the problem.
          That's how mine is and every m1917 &p14 I've seen is. The middle pivot poin for sighting is canted forward a few degrees from sight base. Its a completely different design compared to a Lee Enfield with a plunger and spring which locks it into a positive 90 degree.
          Cheers
          "The answer to 1984 is 1776!" - Mahatma Gandhi

          Comment

          • #6
            Enfield47
            Calguns Addict
            • Sep 2012
            • 6385

            That explains it then. I would have thought that since it was designed by the Brits they would have used the same technology.

            Comment

            • #7
              NOTABIKER
              Calguns Addict
              • Mar 2012
              • 7635

              thanks all for the input.i am a stickler for things working right. looking at the design it looks like it is supposed to be that way. unfortunately mine is more than a couple of degrees. We can look at it at the range sunday.

              Comment

              Working...
              UA-8071174-1