did you actually read the entire newspaper article you cite? here's a quote from it-
"The federal law on “straw purchases” is intended to stop a criminal from having someone who is not a felon, drug user or other miscreant that would get blocked on an FBI background check to buy a gun for him. The buyer, or “straw man,” could then be charged with perjury for lying about the identity of the of the actual purchaser."
do you realize that your Abramski case is not settled law? and that it is one of the Obama administrations' attempts to curtail lawful commerce in firearms?
in your zeal to rain on the OP's parade you have jumped the shark on the actual legal ramifications.
for some reason this motivation is especially prevalent among gun aficianados. I promised K not to fight FUD anymore, but this is just too egregious.
"The federal law on “straw purchases” is intended to stop a criminal from having someone who is not a felon, drug user or other miscreant that would get blocked on an FBI background check to buy a gun for him. The buyer, or “straw man,” could then be charged with perjury for lying about the identity of the of the actual purchaser."
do you realize that your Abramski case is not settled law? and that it is one of the Obama administrations' attempts to curtail lawful commerce in firearms?
in your zeal to rain on the OP's parade you have jumped the shark on the actual legal ramifications.
for some reason this motivation is especially prevalent among gun aficianados. I promised K not to fight FUD anymore, but this is just too egregious.

Comment