I bought a stevens 44 rifle from one of those gun brokers who wouldnt sell to CA.He said he'd sell it if i got a 003FFL and wait. I applied and receivecd the FFL and had the rifle shipped to me.Now for the problem, i don't think its c & r at all.The idiot never looked at the patent dates on the barrel.These rifles were made up to 1948 with the 1894 patent date, this one has the 1889 patent date, it means it was made between 1889 and 1894.So its an antique, not c & r, right. Should i put it in the bound book or not?
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RE:c , r or not
Collapse
X
-
RE:c , r or not
Tags: None -
If unsure, error on the safe side. Better to have an antique on your C&R book than to have a C&R gun that's not recorded.Life Member NRA and 2A Foundation.
My posts are my own opinions and do not reflect those of any organization I am a member of.
Nothing I post should be construed as legal advice; if you need legal advice, see a lawyer.
"Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves."
William Pitt (1759-1806)Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,865,020
Posts: 25,126,087
Members: 355,945
Active Members: 4,111
Welcome to our newest member, glocksource.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 5637 users online. 44 members and 5593 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 10:39 PM on 02-14-2026.

Comment