Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Legality and 03 clarification please.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • VegasND
    Calguns Addict
    • Aug 2007
    • 8621

    Legality and 03 clarification please.

    I've got a couple of questions I think I know the answers to but I'll seek input here. Please let me know if I'm wrong or if there's something I'm not understanding. Remember that I'm a Nevada resident.

    First: I bought 2 pistols today and one of them is C&R. But, since we were doing the 4473 and background check anyway, the FFL put them together and didn't do a C&R sale. He says I don't have to put it in my bound book -- I seem to recall that ALL C&R acquisitions while I'm licensed have to go in the book. Who's right?

    Secondly, if a CA resident wants to buy a C&R rifle from me I can hand it to them after we trade licenses whether we're in CA or not.

    BUT, a pistol is different: if we're inside CA I have to transfer it to them at an 01 FFL. If we're outside CA I can just give it to them after we trade licenses. Is there more?

    I hope I've got this figured out, your explanations and clarifications would be appreciated.
    Last edited by VegasND; 10-30-2010, 10:59 PM. Reason: forgot to specify pistol question
    People don't like to be meddled with. We tell them what to do, what to think, don't run, don't walk. We're in their homes and in their heads and we haven't the right. We're meddlesome.
    --River Tam
  • #2
    mdouglas1980
    Senior Member
    • Jul 2008
    • 871

    If the rifle is less than 50 years old it has to be transferred through a dealer.
    Example: I just bought a Rasheed carbine from a fellow calgunner, it is not 50 years old, but is listed on the Federal C&R list. So it is a C&R but not Cash and Carry in CA.

    so the rifle had to be drosed at an FFL and I have a C&R and a COE so I can take it home with me right then.

    Comment

    • #3
      Flintlock Tom
      Veteran Member
      • Feb 2007
      • 3353

      First: I bought 2 pistols today and one of them is C&R. But, since we were doing the 4473 and background check anyway, the FFL put them together and didn't do a C&R sale. He says I don't have to put it in my bound book -- I seem to recall that ALL C&R acquisitions while I'm licensed have to go in the book. Who's right?
      Yes, it must go in your bound book. For the reason you stated.
      "Everyone must determine for themselves what level of tyranny they are willing to tolerate.
      I let my CA residency expire in 2015."

      Comment

      • #4
        Mssr. Eleganté
        Blue Blaze Irregular
        CGN Contributor - Lifetime
        • Oct 2005
        • 10401

        Originally posted by VegasND
        First: I bought 2 pistols today and one of them is C&R. But, since we were doing the 4473 and background check anyway, the FFL put them together and didn't do a C&R sale. He says I don't have to put it in my bound book -- I seem to recall that ALL C&R acquisitions while I'm licensed have to go in the book. Who's right?
        Yes, the C&R pistol has to go in your bound book. CFR 478.125(f) says that licensed collectors need to record "each receipt and disposition of firearms curios or relics."

        Originally posted by VegasND
        Secondly, if a CA resident wants to buy a C&R rifle from me I can hand it to them after we trade licenses whether we're in CA or not.
        Anywhere in Nevada, or anywhere in most other States besides California, you can trade licenses with a California C&R FFL and hand them any non-NFA C&R firearm. If you are doing the transfer within California then you are limited to handing them C&R long guns over 50 years old.

        Originally posted by VegasND
        BUT, a pistol is different: if we're inside CA I have to transfer it to them at an 01 FFL. If we're outside CA I can just give it to them after we trade licenses.
        Yes. 100% correct.
        __________________

        "Knowledge is power... For REAL!" - Jack Austin

        Comment

        • #5
          Inoxmark
          Senior Member
          • Oct 2005
          • 742

          Anywhere in Nevada, or anywhere in most other States besides California, you can trade licenses with a California C&R FFL and hand them any non-NFA C&R firearm. If you are doing the transfer within California then you are limited to handing them C&R long guns over 50 years old.
          Interesting... Would that apply to modern firearms too then?
          I see logic in your statement, but you'd have to extend that logic to all firearms, not just C&R ?

          Comment

          • #6
            VegasND
            Calguns Addict
            • Aug 2007
            • 8621

            Thanks! I like to ask these questions here because there's so much good knowledge and information you folks share ( especially Mssr. E ).

            It's good to know I had it pretty much correct and thanks for the extra details.
            People don't like to be meddled with. We tell them what to do, what to think, don't run, don't walk. We're in their homes and in their heads and we haven't the right. We're meddlesome.
            --River Tam

            Comment

            • #7
              emcon5
              Veteran Member
              • Sep 2009
              • 3347

              Originally posted by Inoxmark
              Interesting... Would that apply to modern firearms too then?
              I see logic in your statement, but you'd have to extend that logic to all firearms, not just C&R ?
              Because what allows a California resident with a C&R FFL to buy the gun in the first place is the fact he is a C&R FFL. You can't buy modern guns on a 03 FFL.

              Comment

              • #8
                Inoxmark
                Senior Member
                • Oct 2005
                • 742

                Originally posted by emcon5
                Because what allows a California resident with a C&R FFL to buy the gun in the first place is the fact he is a C&R FFL. You can't buy modern guns on a 03 FFL.
                Anyone can buy any gun. The question is whether FFL01 needs to be involved and where the delivery must take place.
                Here's what I mean: federal law states that sale and delivery of a firearm between two residents of same state is legal. I don't see the requirement that such sale must occur in their state of residence. Maybe it's in some other law, I'd like to see it.California's law generally prohibits such sale and transfer, Nevada's law presumably doesn't. So, if two CA residents conduct this transaction in NV, would CA law no longer apply? Because if it does apply then selling C&R handgun would still be illegal, and if it doesn't apply, selling of any non-NFA firearm is legal.

                Comment

                • #9
                  Mssr. Eleganté
                  Blue Blaze Irregular
                  CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                  • Oct 2005
                  • 10401

                  Originally posted by Inoxmark
                  Interesting... Would that apply to modern firearms too then?
                  I see logic in your statement, but you'd have to extend that logic to all firearms, not just C&R ?
                  Originally posted by Inoxmark
                  Anyone can buy any gun. The question is whether FFL01 needs to be involved and where the delivery must take place.
                  Here's what I mean: federal law states that sale and delivery of a firearm between two residents of same state is legal. I don't see the requirement that such sale must occur in their state of residence. Maybe it's in some other law, I'd like to see it.California's law generally prohibits such sale and transfer, Nevada's law presumably doesn't. So, if two CA residents conduct this transaction in NV, would CA law no longer apply? Because if it does apply then selling C&R handgun would still be illegal, and if it doesn't apply, selling of any non-NFA firearm is legal.
                  My response was tailored to VegasND's situation as a C&R FFL who is a resident of Nevada. But you are correct that two California residents could travel to another State that does not regulate private firearms transfers and transfer any firearm from one California resident to another. But the problem is that it would then be illegal under Federal law for the receiving California resident to ever transport that firearm back into California. That's because of...

                  It shall be unlawful --

                  (3) for any person, other than a licensed importer, licensed manufacturer, licensed dealer, or licensed collector to transport into or receive in the State where he resides (or if the person is a corporation or other business entity, the State where it maintains a place of business) any firearm purchased or otherwise obtained by such person outside that State,...
                  and...

                  Out-of-State acquisition of firearms by nonlicensees.

                  No person, other than a licensed importer, licensed manufacturer, licensed dealer, or licensed collector, shall transport into or receive in the State where the person resides (or if a corporation or other business entity, where it maintains a place of business) any firearm purchased or otherwise obtained by such person outside that State...
                  We discussed this idea earlier of two Californians going to another State to transfer firearms that would be illegal to transfer in California. But not being able to bring the firearm back to California is kind of a problem.

                  __________________

                  "Knowledge is power... For REAL!" - Jack Austin

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  UA-8071174-1