I have a T-38 with Mum intact, no import stamp. Would this be a bringback? Are all intact Mum, no import stamp Arisakas bringbacks?
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type 38 a bringback?
Collapse
X
-
I don't think so -- There were no import stamps before 1998? or what ever date. I think the mum's were only ground on those weapons captured in Japan -those captured elsewhere, China, Korea, ect did not have the mums ground off. Mine was a battlefield pickup from Okinawa, mum is intact but weapon had seen better days :-) At least I think that is correct info -- -
SKSCJ - It might be, it might not. I've heard how some GI's brought back mum'd rifles from a hidden cache in 1946. I have two rifles with commemorative plates of Yokusuka 1945, both mummed. The owner probably bribed the grinder. There just is no fast rule on the ground vs. mummed issue. There is even an anecdote by a surviving Japanese soldier that his unit defaced their own rifles, knowing that they would be dead soon. Luckily for him, he was knocked unconscious and captured.
Gunboat - Not quite true. The Chinese imports from 88-89 were a mixed bag and import stamped (usually Oyster Bay, NY). Some had intact mums, some were defaced and a few had been restamped by the PRC.Comment
-
I doubt all bringbacks had papers -- my rifle did not, the two swords did --but they were obtained at different times and places -- the rifle at Okinawa, the swords from the surrender of japanese forces Tsingtao, China. The sword papers are signed by the British customs officer who had just been recently released from four years plus captivity. More than you wanted to know, old man's memories.Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,864,742
Posts: 25,122,843
Members: 355,945
Active Members: 4,313
Welcome to our newest member, glocksource.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 10332 users online. 123 members and 10209 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 10:39 PM on 02-14-2026.

Comment