Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Remington M1917

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • highpower
    Calguns Addict
    • May 2012
    • 5294

    Remington M1917

    While I was picking up my new Zastava M70 earlier today, I spotted this Remington M1917 in the used rifle section. A semi-detailed inspection revealed that I just couldn't bear to live without it. Trouble was I had just dropped all my money on the M70, so I had to put it on layaway for a few weeks.



    Barrel is dated 3-18 which, according to the table published by the CMP, is three months earlier than when the receiver was made in June of that year. I can't say offhand if Remington, or any other M1917 manufacturer for that matter, were the same as Springfield Armory in regards to barrel dates vs receiver dates, but it is generally accepted that barrels on original SA rifles can be dated from 0 to three months earlier than the receiver date. The overall condition of this rifle leads me to believe that it is the original barrel.


    The infamous and unknown 3GM-K inspection cartouche.


    What attracted me to it is that it still has it's original blue finish. The greenish tint that comes out in the pictures is from the lighting in the store and a coat of dried linseed oil that covers the entire rifle. The stock has the "R" stamped in the tip and the stock doesn't appear to have been sanded. The only part on it that isn't Remington is the bolt stop which is from Eddystone. I didn't take a picture of them, but the Eagle Head inspection stamps on the underside of the stock ahead of the magazine and behind the trigger guard are still crisp.

    Many years ago I had a near perfect Remington M1917 that I let slip away in a fit of stupidity and have been looking for another original condition Remington for at least a dozen years. I currently have a Winchester M1917 and an original finish Remington P14, so this will fit nicely in the collection.
    MLC member.

    Biden, proof that stupid people shouldn't be allowed to vote.

    Dumocraps suck balls.
  • #2
    sbo80
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2014
    • 2264

    Very nice, the 1917 is I think underrated these days. I don't know about the dates thing, mine is a Remington with a November 1918 serial, but also a 3-18 barrel. I can't say if mine are "original" to each other, and it's in an Eddystone stock. Hard to say with something so old. But mine certainly never shipped to Europe, so very well could have mostly just sat and never needed re-finishing. It looks like it never left the armory.

    Comment

    • #3
      SkyHawk
      I need a LIFE!!
      • Sep 2012
      • 23495

      That's a beauty!

      I scored an excellent Remington M1917 for a song a few years back and I really have not taken time to inspect much on it. Perhaps I can post some pics here soon and you resident experts can tell me what I have.
      Click here for my iTrader Feedback thread: https://www.calguns.net/forum/market...r-feedback-100

      Comment

      • #4
        19K
        Veteran Member
        • Aug 2013
        • 3621

        Rebuilt after the war is a possibility.

        Comment

        • #5
          Rogerbutthead
          Veteran Member
          • Jul 2006
          • 3812

          Nice looking rifle.

          I recall hearing that the 1917 had weak receivers that often cracked.

          Do you have anything to say about that - ?

          I just got an all correct Remington 1917. While inspecting it I discovered what appears to be a crack in the receiver ring at the 7 o'clock position. I need to confirm if it is actually a crack. My question; if this is indeed a crack, can it be successfully welded/repaired to be safe to fire...


          Guys, All the books make a huge a fuss on the M1903 low number. But the documents paint an entirely different picture on the low numbers, than what the books state. But what I did find, that I have never seen in any book, is there were a lot of safety issues with the M1917's. Even in WWI...


          That rumor always had me leery of shooting my 1917 that much. I do like owning one of the rifles that Sergeant York used to win his Medal of Honor.
          (apparently this story disagrees with my memory - https://www.thearmorylife.com/the-legend-of-sgt-york)

          Congrats on the acquisition.
          Last edited by Rogerbutthead; 09-10-2023, 2:05 AM.

          Comment

          • #6
            highpower
            Calguns Addict
            • May 2012
            • 5294

            Originally posted by Rogerbutthead
            Nice looking rifle.

            I recall hearing that the 1917 had weak receivers that often cracked.

            Do you have anything to say about that - ?

            I just got an all correct Remington 1917. While inspecting it I discovered what appears to be a crack in the receiver ring at the 7 o'clock position. I need to confirm if it is actually a crack. My question; if this is indeed a crack, can it be successfully welded/repaired to be safe to fire...


            Guys, All the books make a huge a fuss on the M1903 low number. But the documents paint an entirely different picture on the low numbers, than what the books state. But what I did find, that I have never seen in any book, is there were a lot of safety issues with the M1917's. Even in WWI...


            That rumor always had me leery of shooting my 1917 that much. I do like owning one of the rifles that Sergeant York used to win his Medal of Honor.
            (apparently this story disagrees with my memory - https://www.thearmorylife.com/the-legend-of-sgt-york)

            Congrats on the acquisition.
            The receiver cracking associated with Eddystone made rifles is attributed to the barrels being over tightened at the factory. The cracks were not visible with the original finish, but would become visible when the receiver was polished when turning one into a sporter. If it was mine, I would have the receiver magnafluxed to see if it is cracked, if it isn't it should be safe to shoot as long as the headspace is correct.

            M1917's are renowned for having super strong receivers and a great many were modified in the interwar period to take magnum cartridges for very large game.
            Last edited by highpower; 09-16-2023, 7:26 AM.
            MLC member.

            Biden, proof that stupid people shouldn't be allowed to vote.

            Dumocraps suck balls.

            Comment

            • #7
              Mojaveman
              Senior Member
              • Jan 2010
              • 1126

              Had a Remington 1917 some years ago and was impressed by how accurate it was. There are some videos on YouTube of people shooting them to 700+ yards. Wish I wouldn't have sold it. Lots of parts are still available to include new barrels. The only thing I didn't like about it was that the rear sight isn't adjustable for windage.
              "Any honest and hardworking man is made better yet by a large bowl of good chili."

              Comment

              • #8
                BrokerB
                Calguns Addict
                • Sep 2010
                • 5282

                I like the pistol grip on that stock
                Beans and Bullets

                Comment

                • #9
                  redbridge
                  Junior Member
                  • Mar 2023
                  • 47

                  Looks really nice!

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    offrdmania
                    Veteran Member
                    • Mar 2008
                    • 4047

                    I have my grandfathers Remington 1917. The barrel is dated 1/18
                    Attached Files
                    Previous iTrader rating, over 150 Positive ratings

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      Bladewurk
                      Senior Member
                      • Dec 2005
                      • 1403

                      Nice rifle!
                      I’ve been trying to replace a 1917 I bought and sold 30 years ago .. as well.
                      They are really heavy duty rifles, and that one looks great.
                      (quote)"Glocks blow up, SIGs have a high bore axis, Beretta locking blocks break, Ruger is anti-gun, 1911s are unreliable, and HK hates you. Get over it."

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        echo1
                        Veteran Member
                        • Apr 2010
                        • 3858

                        Very nice rifle HP. I picked up a sport Eddystone quite some time ago. It was exactly what I had been seeking, an inexpensive sporter with unmolested metal bits, since I scored on some 1917 furniture from an estate sale years earlier. Later I found a correct bayo. PAX
                        You need a crew

                        "A free people should be armed and disciplined" (George Washington),

                        Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.~John Adams 1798

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          offrdmania
                          Veteran Member
                          • Mar 2008
                          • 4047

                          The furniture is getting hard to find these days and most of whats out there is later mid-40s furniture when these guns went through the arsenal rebuilds.
                          WWI furniture is near impossible to find and when it does come up, goes for $500-700 just for the stock if it has the right stamps and finish on it.
                          Previous iTrader rating, over 150 Positive ratings

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          UA-8071174-1