Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Enfield No4 Rear Sight

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dfletcher
    I need a LIFE!!
    • Dec 2006
    • 14787

    Enfield No4 Rear Sight

    I recently bought a Golden State Enfield "Jungle Carbine" made from a cut down No4 Mk II and it carries the micrometer rear sight. A fixed peep when flipped down and adjustable when up. The fixed peep is pretty much a ghost ring. Not that I expect great accuracy from the gun but doing a bit of fiddling I found that a peep rear (Williams, Lyman, Parker Hale) shank almost screws into the fixed and gives a finer sight picture with its smaller diameter hole.

    I ran a 7/32X40 tap through the fixed peep (shank threading of above apertures) and it cuts deep enough to hold fine.

    Some additional work may be done, such as threading the shank full to the peep so that it sits flat against the sight base and allows the bolt to pass when the micrometer is flipped up. The standard fixed and stamped micrometer can be similarly modified to include the peep on the adjustable slide.

    The peep on the fixed can still be used as a ghost ring, threads aren't visible when sighting.

    Just curious - anyone else done this? Seems an easy improvement over issue.
    GOA Member & SAF Life Member
  • #2
    smle-man
    I need a LIFE!!
    • Jan 2007
    • 10580

    AJ Parker made an attachment for the Mk I rear sight that gave it windage and elevation adjustments as well as accepting threaded peeps. I have a couple for my rifles

    That's about the only similar thing that I've seen to what you've done. The battle sight is intended for rapid snap shooting in low light or moving combat conditions thus the very large aperture.



    Not my rifle - borrowed from the internet

    Comment

    • #3
      dfletcher
      I need a LIFE!!
      • Dec 2006
      • 14787

      ^
      Very nice stuff.

      The battle sight is just a bit too open for me and I think reducing to a "shank only" .093 or .125 diameter would improve it for me.

      D&T the micrometer opens things up a bit too much and would require use of a screw in aperture. I think I'd want to have a "shank only" for that too, when not using something wider.

      Always something to experiment with -
      GOA Member & SAF Life Member

      Comment

      Working...
      UA-8071174-1