My dad has this old revolver. I did some searches and found its a F&W from 1890s. Anyone fire modern ammo out of these?
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F&W Revolver
Collapse
X
-
AFAIK...
F&W = Forehand & Wadsworth
1871-1890 = Forehand & Wadsworth
1890-1902 = Forehand Arms Company
1902 = Hopkins & Allen acquired and disolved the company.
If your F&W revolver is in .38 caliber, it's either a .38S&W or a .38RF.
.38RF has been out of production for about a century and .38S&W is currently a limited production cartridge (PPU, Fiocchi, Magtech, Remington, India Ordinance Factory).
Note that .38S&W aka .38/200 is not compatible with the more common .38Special cartridge.Last edited by Quiet; 03-07-2021, 9:24 AM.sigpic
"If someone has a gun and is trying to kill you, it would be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun." - Dalai Lama (Seattle Times, 05-15-2001).Comment
-
I will add to Quiet's post by heartily recommending that you do NOT shoot it with modern ammo. Those old second tier top breaks weren't the most robust affairs when they were new (they were inexpensive for a reason, most have iron frames) and they were designed with black powder ammunition in mind. In addition, 150 ish years hasn't made them any stronger in addition to any mechanical issues that might be present.
It is most likely .38S&W. A quick check of where the firing pin sits in relation to the chamber will tell you if it is rim fire or center fire. If it was mine and I wanted to make it go bang from time to time, providing it is a center fire gun, I would get a lee loader and load up a few .38 S&W shells with the appropriate load of BP and blaze away. After cleaning up the powder fouling thoroughly enough to eliminate the risk of corrosion you will no doubt have scratched the itch enough to be good for a while before you will want to shoot it again.MLC member.
Biden, proof that stupid people shouldn't be allowed to vote.
Dumocraps suck balls.Comment
-
I will add to Quiet's post by heartily recommending that you do NOT shoot it with modern ammo. Those old second tier top breaks weren't the most robust affairs when they were new (they were inexpensive for a reason, most have iron frames) and they were designed with black powder ammunition in mind. In addition, 150 ish years hasn't made them any stronger in addition to any mechanical issues that might be present.
It is most likely .38S&W. A quick check of where the firing pin sits in relation to the chamber will tell you if it is rim fire or center fire. If it was mine and I wanted to make it go bang from time to time, providing it is a center fire gun, I would get a lee loader and load up a few .38 S&W shells with the appropriate load of BP and blaze away. After cleaning up the powder fouling thoroughly enough to eliminate the risk of corrosion you will no doubt have scratched the itch enough to be good for a while before you will want to shoot it again.
Thank you!! I will definitely let him know.
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkComment
-
This fellow knows of what he speaks ^I will add to Quiet's post by heartily recommending that you do NOT shoot it with modern ammo. Those old second tier top breaks weren't the most robust affairs when they were new (they were inexpensive for a reason, most have iron frames) and they were designed with black powder ammunition in mind. In addition, 150 ish years hasn't made them any stronger in addition to any mechanical issues that might be present.
It is most likely .38S&W. A quick check of where the firing pin sits in relation to the chamber will tell you if it is rim fire or center fire. If it was mine and I wanted to make it go bang from time to time, providing it is a center fire gun, I would get a lee loader and load up a few .38 S&W shells with the appropriate load of BP and blaze away. After cleaning up the powder fouling thoroughly enough to eliminate the risk of corrosion you will no doubt have scratched the itch enough to be good for a while before you will want to shoot it again.
I bought a few of these when I was starting out collecting, I was young and broke and found them at flea markets and antique shops. I shot the hell out of the .22's both long and short, but, wouldn't trust one in center fire (I had a .32, .38 and a Spanish .44 over the years), even with cowboy/light loads, it's your eye-sight and or trigger finger that's at risk, lol.
To say that metallurgy has come a long way since those days would be an understatement.
If your dad just has to - buy him a box of .38 movie blanks and have at it.Pitfighter.
CA/AZComment
-
I fire Fiocchi and PPU 38SW out of my top break, however that is with the caveat it is in decent condition and is made by Iver Johnson. It is the last model before they moved to smokeless, however, it handles the smokeless ammo without the cylinder lockup becoming loose, the threading getting marred etc etc.Comment
-
This fellow knows of what he speaks ^
I bought a few of these when I was starting out collecting, I was young and broke and found them at flea markets and antique shops. I shot the hell out of the .22's both long and short, but, wouldn't trust one in center fire (I had a .32, .38 and a Spanish .44 over the years), even with cowboy/light loads, it's your eye-sight and or trigger finger that's at risk, lol.
To say that metallurgy has come a long way since those days would be an understatement.
If your dad just has to - buy him a box of .38 movie blanks and have at it.
Thank you. I dont think he will be firing it. Lol he values his life more. I appreciate the info
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkComment
-
-
I fire Fiocchi and PPU 38SW out of my top break, however that is with the caveat it is in decent condition and is made by Iver Johnson. It is the last model before they moved to smokeless, however, it handles the smokeless ammo without the cylinder lockup becoming loose, the threading getting marred etc etc.
Thank you. I think he wont be firing it. He assumed it was just a normal revolver and ammo. Thank you for the info
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkComment
-
"I don't own them. I'm just their caretaker for a little while until they go on to the next caretaker. They aren't TOOLS.....they WERE tools but are now artifacts, implements of an earlier age that PRODUCED history and brought mankind's timeline to where it is at this moment. And as such, it is my responsibility to preserve them."Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,862,388
Posts: 25,092,840
Members: 355,415
Active Members: 4,693
Welcome to our newest member, scentedtrunk.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 8689 users online. 37 members and 8652 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 11:39 PM on 02-14-2026.






Comment