I caught the Broomhandle bug a few months back after discussing them with a salesman at RifleGear during a transfer. I have read a lot on the guns in the past months to try to determine what I had. Of course that’s sometimes a bad idea because you than want each variant, in each caliber, and in the best shape you can find….but I am retired so I only can buy lower grade units!!!
One gun which intrigued me was a fake Broomhandle built by Astra. To say it’s a knock off of the highest quality would not be an exaggeration. To say it’s a blatant improvement would also not be stretching the truth, as the Astra 900 was designed in 1928 and employs a much more streamlined approach in terms of trigger mechanisms, etc. I would venture to guess the Astra probably employs less than half the machining steps to produce than a Mauser Broomhandle, and time is money. Also the gun appears to be easier to maintain, but alas there is no outlet for Astra parts.
The stab to the heart of Mauser is the company only sold a small number of guns to the German military, like 1,200, ot the Luftwaffe in WW2. The Astra however did sign a contract with the German military in WW2 as Mauser was too busy producing Luger and P38s.
The Broomhandle lost out to the Luger in trials to supply the Germans before WW1. One of the main issues was the safety, which wasn’t very safe, and would fire the gun when switched to fire from safe…no trigger needed!! Many officers in other armies did buy the Broomhandle, such as Winston Churchill…and of course some of the Russian Royal family was killed using a Broomhandle. The bolo actually is short for Bolshevik!! This gun should be popular with the communists in the CA state legislature!
Here are a few pics of my Mauser circa 1937 (1930 variant) and the Astra 900.


Astra right side up close

Mauser right side

Mauser left side
One gun which intrigued me was a fake Broomhandle built by Astra. To say it’s a knock off of the highest quality would not be an exaggeration. To say it’s a blatant improvement would also not be stretching the truth, as the Astra 900 was designed in 1928 and employs a much more streamlined approach in terms of trigger mechanisms, etc. I would venture to guess the Astra probably employs less than half the machining steps to produce than a Mauser Broomhandle, and time is money. Also the gun appears to be easier to maintain, but alas there is no outlet for Astra parts.
The stab to the heart of Mauser is the company only sold a small number of guns to the German military, like 1,200, ot the Luftwaffe in WW2. The Astra however did sign a contract with the German military in WW2 as Mauser was too busy producing Luger and P38s.
The Broomhandle lost out to the Luger in trials to supply the Germans before WW1. One of the main issues was the safety, which wasn’t very safe, and would fire the gun when switched to fire from safe…no trigger needed!! Many officers in other armies did buy the Broomhandle, such as Winston Churchill…and of course some of the Russian Royal family was killed using a Broomhandle. The bolo actually is short for Bolshevik!! This gun should be popular with the communists in the CA state legislature!
Here are a few pics of my Mauser circa 1937 (1930 variant) and the Astra 900.


Astra right side up close

Mauser right side

Mauser left side










Comment