It is not only if it is marketed as a flash hider. If it meets the written description it is still a flash suppresor. If it is marketed as a flash hider then that wold disqualify it too.
Being told something by the DOJ does not mean anything. They tell people all sorts of things, some of which aren't even true. Unless there is a written letter of opinion specifically stating that the BattleComp is not a flash suppresor and it is acceptable for a featureless build than the mere fact that it does reduce the flash signature is enough to classify it as such.
Being told something by the DOJ does not mean anything. They tell people all sorts of things, some of which aren't even true. Unless there is a written letter of opinion specifically stating that the BattleComp is not a flash suppresor and it is acceptable for a featureless build than the mere fact that it does reduce the flash signature is enough to classify it as such.







Comment