I've been getting ready to move to CA.
Asked questions on forums, even spoke to some gun range reps in South Bay area.
I am getting conflicting information about my rifles that I want to bring into CA.
Looked at the 'chart' (why one would need 3 pages to determine if anything is legal is a whole different discussion - but so be it).
The chart asks several flow chart style questions. The way I interpret it is:
1. Not registered in CA before ban (bringing it into CA with me)
2. It is an AR style rifle (open to interpretation but IMO yes - LR-308)
3. It is in appendix B (DPMS Panther LR-308)
result: violated 30510 a.
For the HK MP-5 SD (.22LR), I read:
1. Not registered in CA before ban
2. Not AR/AK style
3. Barrel longer than 16" (16.1 per spec)
4. Not listed in Appendix A
5. Not chambered in .50BMG (.22LR)
6. It is less than 30 " if collapse stock
Result: violates 30510 a again.
Seems like after going through the chart, all arrows lead to the same 'illegal' box...lol.
Now, I asked the gun range person when speaking to them, and they said that as long as it has a bullet button installed, and magazine is 10 rounds or less, and no flash hiders/suppressors are hanging off the barrel, and barrel is not SBR, that I am OK.
I wanted to verify with you fine folks. Last thing I want to do is do something illegal, but this fine state sure makes it hard to be legal with firearms.
If you can please look at each of my rifles' pics and comment on legal/not and if can be made legal (if yes, what I would have to do).
My LR-308 in attachment (the barrel has compensator/muzzle break, not a flash hider - made by Vais Arms, in TX).
My HK MP5 .22LR identical to one in link HERE
O yeah, going to reside either in N. San Jose or Milpitas.
Really, really appreciate it.
Asked questions on forums, even spoke to some gun range reps in South Bay area.
I am getting conflicting information about my rifles that I want to bring into CA.
Looked at the 'chart' (why one would need 3 pages to determine if anything is legal is a whole different discussion - but so be it).
The chart asks several flow chart style questions. The way I interpret it is:
1. Not registered in CA before ban (bringing it into CA with me)
2. It is an AR style rifle (open to interpretation but IMO yes - LR-308)
3. It is in appendix B (DPMS Panther LR-308)
result: violated 30510 a.
For the HK MP-5 SD (.22LR), I read:
1. Not registered in CA before ban
2. Not AR/AK style
3. Barrel longer than 16" (16.1 per spec)
4. Not listed in Appendix A
5. Not chambered in .50BMG (.22LR)
6. It is less than 30 " if collapse stock
Result: violates 30510 a again.
Seems like after going through the chart, all arrows lead to the same 'illegal' box...lol.
Now, I asked the gun range person when speaking to them, and they said that as long as it has a bullet button installed, and magazine is 10 rounds or less, and no flash hiders/suppressors are hanging off the barrel, and barrel is not SBR, that I am OK.
I wanted to verify with you fine folks. Last thing I want to do is do something illegal, but this fine state sure makes it hard to be legal with firearms.
If you can please look at each of my rifles' pics and comment on legal/not and if can be made legal (if yes, what I would have to do).
My LR-308 in attachment (the barrel has compensator/muzzle break, not a flash hider - made by Vais Arms, in TX).
My HK MP5 .22LR identical to one in link HERE
O yeah, going to reside either in N. San Jose or Milpitas.
Really, really appreciate it.
Comment