In speaking with a friend he made a comment about preferring a surplus demilled rifle over a saiga.
His observations were that saigas were built and the parts measured and separated by size into 3 categories.
So when built, they used the same size parts to build a gun.
But if you swapped bolt and carriers between several different guns, they might not run.
He also said that the post sample class 3 guns built on saigas tended to fail.
He preferred almost every used military demilled kit to built an AK over the saiga conversions.
His logic was that the Russians were still building to 1950's technology and that as long as the parts ended up fitting and running, it was a sellable gun.
Can anyone confirm of all of the saigas are built to the same dimensions and parts are interchangeable?????
His observations were that saigas were built and the parts measured and separated by size into 3 categories.
So when built, they used the same size parts to build a gun.
But if you swapped bolt and carriers between several different guns, they might not run.
He also said that the post sample class 3 guns built on saigas tended to fail.
He preferred almost every used military demilled kit to built an AK over the saiga conversions.
His logic was that the Russians were still building to 1950's technology and that as long as the parts ended up fitting and running, it was a sellable gun.
Can anyone confirm of all of the saigas are built to the same dimensions and parts are interchangeable?????


Comment