vamfire free lock question

[jpx0123]

saw this and was thinking of getting one, but website says it is not CA DOJ approved. does that mean if I put one of these on that I would be breaking the bullet button law?

[Josh3239]

No bullet button is ca approved. DOJ refuses to issue an opinion. Your overthinking it.

[jpx0123]

so I should be ok if I installed this then.

[Chaos47]

saw this and was thinking of getting one, but website says it is not CA DOJ approved. does that mean if I put one of these on that I would be breaking the bullet button law?

There are no CA DOJ approved devices and there is no "bullet button law".
I strongly urge you to read the law for yourself and learn why certain firearm configurations are legal or not.

http://law.onecle.com/california/penal/30515.html

30515. (a) Notwithstanding Section 30510, "assault weapon" also
means any of the following:
(1) A semiautomatic, centerfire rifle that has the capacity to
accept a detachable magazine and any one of the following:
(A) A pistol grip that protrudes conspicuously beneath the action
of the weapon.
(B) A thumbhole stock.
(C) A folding or telescoping stock.
(D) A grenade launcher or flare launcher.
(E) A flash suppressor.
(F) A forward pistol grip.
(2) A semiautomatic, centerfire rifle that has a fixed magazine
with the capacity to accept more than 10 rounds.
(3) A semiautomatic, centerfire rifle that has an overall length
of less than 30 inches.

[jpx0123]

I've read this already..but still confused sometimes. I understand that having a bullet button installed makes an AR15 not an AW because a tool is required to be used to remove the mag. but the BB that have the setting ability when outside of CA and other states that have a AW ban where part of the BB either protrudes out where a tool is no longer needed, I am not sure if that is making the BB not really a BB anymore. don't know if I explained that right. any ways too much of a headache. I think I may just stick with the plain jane BB.