There is a pretty long thread going on M4C right now about PSA...in short, stay away from the PTAC line, and inspect what they send you, and expect long shipping times, other than that you should be good to go with their lpk.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
PSA vs P-tac LPK-opinions?
Collapse
X
-
Actually the AR wood furniture is a really unique look. But it also costs a small fortune. The MOE is just the start of the MNergy, next is a rail with a couple of lights, bayonet, sights; red dot and BUIS, you know the rest. MOE is like marijuana; it's the Gateway to further MN.....Mo' BBs.Comment
-
P-tac is Psa's home brand. From my understanding, they have a local business (new in the market) making parts for Psa. They aren't perfect, hence the cheap prices for ptac parts.
Imo just spend extra on a quality parts. If this parts fails on you, you'll end up spending more time and money in repairs.Comment
-
Sights are OK; it's when you have a red dot, BUIS, 45 degree angled optic(both sides), on the same upper. THAT'S when it goes MNgery.
Extra MN points for a vertical forward grip with the little bi-pod in it....Comment
-
Why you gotta hate on my grip pod bro? And how is moe furniture mall ninja in any way? And wtf are you talking about with the mil using it?Comment
-
Actually PSA is PSA's "home brand". PTAC is another brand that PSA carries.
You are right, though, that PSA is also the sole distributor of PTAC, and in all reality, Practical Tactical is probably just a shell company that is very closely related to PSA even if it is not the same company.Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,856,744
Posts: 25,023,644
Members: 354,026
Active Members: 5,895
Welcome to our newest member, Hadesloridan.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 4069 users online. 155 members and 3914 guests.
Most users ever online was 65,177 at 7:20 PM on 09-21-2024.
Comment