Was "multi" caliber acceptable during the last AWB

[SemperFi1775]

How accurate do we have to be with the Purchase Date? Exact, or do they just want the year and month?

Great question. How in the hell are people going to remember or find out when they purchased their rifles, even the where or from whom part will be difficult for many.


Sent from classified location using Tapatalk.

I dont remember the time date location or from whom I bought my rifles from. They are just gonna have to deal with it.....good thing I lost most of them In a boating accident

i doubt if doj will be going after each registration... however, since all of this data will be electronically submitted, it's easy enough to see the patterns and make an example of someone, especially when it's submitted under penalty of perjury...

it's another convenient way of stripping someone's 2a rights....

[luckystrike]

That would most likely get a knock at the door response.....

"scuse me sur, *drool* Im from the doj and want to see DEEZ NUTZ"

[skyhanger00]

Not sure if related, but where does a multi caliber marked lower built in .22 lr fit in?

We won't know until you're arrested and made into a test case. I can see legal justification behind both camps.

For example, in Canada, due to some legal precedence, it's now legal to have AR mags labeled for 5 rounds of .50 Beowulf, and top it up with 15 rounds of 5.56, but a mag that labeled for 5.56 and holds more than 5 rounds will get you arrested.

Even if that .22lr marked lower is legal to be unregistered. As soon as you mount a centerfire semiautomatic upper on it, they can argue that you have manufactured (or more technically, converted) a unregistered AW.