Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Lantac Dragon vs VG6 gamma56 vs Surefire MB566k

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • kevlar711yo
    Junior Member
    • Aug 2013
    • 6

    Lantac Dragon vs VG6 gamma56 vs Surefire MB566k

    Hi, does anyone have any experience with these muzzle devices. If you have tried all 3 of these muzzle devices which one do you think is the best? Also any other brands that you recommend that are better than these please chime in too? Thanks!
    Criteria:
    1)Recoil
    2)Muzzle rise
    3)Noise( Least amount of noise, although most brakes are loud)
  • #2
    Arson
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2011
    • 1818

    MB556K, because I don't want anybody on my left or right.
    Very little felt recoil
    Minor if any muzzle rise
    If people stay on each side of you, the break isan't doing it's job right.
    sigpic

    Comment

    • #3
      mlevans66
      Calguns Addict
      • Oct 2009
      • 9516

      Surefire is good but pricey. Try this one
      The liberal see's the glass as half full and tries to take more.
      The conservative see's glass as half empty and tries to keep it that way.
      I'm with the people on the side just pouring water in the glass trying to get a drink!

      Comment

      • #4
        cfusionpm
        Veteran Member
        • Apr 2011
        • 2926

        Originally posted by kevlar711yo
        Criteria:
        1)Recoil
        2)Muzzle rise
        3)Noise( Least amount of noise, although most brakes are loud)
        SF MB556K
        1) Zero recoil
        2) Zero muzzle rise
        3) Not loud at all for the shooter, pretty loud and concussive for others.

        At Angeles, I had no problem double tapping the steel targets at 300 and 400. Could easily spot impacts and fire quick followup shots at 500 and 600 too. It helps having a heavy gun, but that brake completely eliminates felt recoil and rise.
        Last edited by cfusionpm; 09-20-2013, 4:37 PM.

        Comment

        • #5
          kevlar711yo
          Junior Member
          • Aug 2013
          • 6

          I wonder if people in the military or law enforcement use muzzle brakes. If they do would it screw up their ears without hearing protection?

          Comment

          • #6
            kevlar711yo
            Junior Member
            • Aug 2013
            • 6

            Anybody here have any experience with Lantac Dragon or VG6 Gamma 556.

            Comment

            • #7
              PhoPoweR
              Member
              • Oct 2011
              • 334

              The Lantac Dragon just came out so I doubt anyone has any real world experience with it.
              /ᐠ - ˕ -マ ᶻ 𝘇 𐰁

              Comment

              • #8
                rero360
                Veteran Member
                • Dec 2009
                • 3926

                Originally posted by kevlar711yo
                I wonder if people in the military or law enforcement use muzzle brakes. If they do would it screw up their ears without hearing protection?
                Most do not use brakes, especially in the Military as it's generally frowned upon changing the muzzle device yourself without command approval. And yes, you better believe it would jack up your hearing royally shooting without ear pro, more so I would think than using the normal flash hider as it is directing more noise and blast backwards.

                Comment

                • #9
                  pc_load_letter
                  Veteran Member
                  • Jan 2011
                  • 2520

                  I have the VG6 on my AR. I like the small profile and very good performance.

                  I've used the SF MB556K as well as others from Griffin. The VG6 has been the best so far.

                  I hope to try the Bravo Company brake soon.

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    problemchild
                    Banned
                    • Oct 2005
                    • 6959

                    I own the Bravo, SF, PWS, Dark Metal Design, JP and several others. Hands down the SF has them all beat. Here is the reason why....

                    The SF drives the gun straight back without muzzle dip or rise or torque roll.

                    If you watch the Dragon and VG youtube videos you can see both have dip and some torque roll.

                    I can empty 10rds in 2 seconds into a torso target with a 3.5x acog mounted and the crosshairs stay right on center mass.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      FMJBT
                      Veteran Member
                      • Mar 2007
                      • 4888

                      Originally posted by kevlar711yo
                      I wonder if people in the military or law enforcement use muzzle brakes. If they do would it screw up their ears without hearing protection?
                      Muzzle brakes on military rifles are typically run as mounts for suppressors, so the need for hearing protection is negated for the most part. Very few service rifles run them though. I can only think of the MK 12, and some of the newer FN SCAR rifles that SOCOM uses. Some of the mil variants of the Remington 700 are also sometimes equipped with Surefire brakes/suppressors.
                      U.S. Navy (Retired) 1994-2015

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        kevlar711yo
                        Junior Member
                        • Aug 2013
                        • 6

                        Originally posted by pc_load_letter
                        I have the VG6 on my AR. I like the small profile and very good performance.

                        I've used the SF MB556K as well as others from Griffin. The VG6 has been the best so far.

                        I hope to try the Bravo Company brake soon.
                        Is it better in terms of Recoil, Muzzle rise, noise?

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          kevlar711yo
                          Junior Member
                          • Aug 2013
                          • 6

                          Originally posted by problemchild
                          I own the Bravo, SF, PWS, Dark Metal Design, JP and several others. Hands down the SF has them all beat. Here is the reason why....

                          The SF drives the gun straight back without muzzle dip or rise or torque roll.

                          If you watch the Dragon and VG youtube videos you can see both have dip and some torque roll.

                          I can empty 10rds in 2 seconds into a torso target with a 3.5x acog mounted and the crosshairs stay right on center mass.
                          So you tried both the Dragon and VG too, cause I was guessing one of those devices would be better the Surefire. Also do you the SF MB556k is better than the SJC Titan?

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            sd_shooter
                            I need a LIFE!!
                            • Dec 2008
                            • 13213

                            Another vote for the surefire, I have the MB556k and the newer SFMB556. Both make the 223 feel like a 22.

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              JamesY
                              Veteran Member
                              • Apr 2006
                              • 2652

                              Originally posted by kevlar711yo
                              So you tried both the Dragon and VG too, cause I was guessing one of those devices would be better the Surefire. Also do you the SF MB556k is better than the SJC Titan?
                              Some folks here think the Titan is more effective. I run titans on three rifles. One is a 308 and they shoot soft and flat. The 223s feel like 22s and the 308 feels like a 223.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1