I need some opinions or a nudge off the fence in deciding an optic. Currently have on my AR a Bushnell TRS-25 which for all intents and purposes make a great basic range RDS. It has been mostly reliable. Had an issue with it blinking out after shots on lower power but a quick cleaning of the terminals and tightening fixed it.
I recently acquired a Vortex Strikefire in a trade to put on my tacticool AR-22 to replace a broken cheapo barska. I never was a fan of that style RDS or so I thought. Until I got it. I absolutely love it. I immediately wondered why I didn't just put it on my actual AR. It then had me wondering some more. Aimpoint PRO optics are decently priced. I am no operator and don't pretend to be one. I just like the idea of it's reliability and battery life to price point. Fairly impressive from the reviews and such. I like the look of micro dots quite a bit so making the change to that style would be mostly cosmetic hurtles for me. Just when I thought I figured it out and was going to charge it to my card.... I got to check out my friend's Vortex PTS 1-4x24. Yeah... now I don't know what I want.
I know they serve a different purpose and an RDS has advantages in some areas that low power variable scopes don't have. Easier to shoot from weird angles, faster close range acquisition, no eye box or eye relief. I have heard the argument for 1-4's also being at close range it is only slightly slower to acquire, you can obviously ID a target further (in my case very scary paper), more versatile in other ways etc. The issue is, price goes up and more things needed. Mounts are an added cost too. Are a low power variable really the "future" and replacements for RDS like some like to say? I can't seem to see how they would be. I also see them being quite a bit less durable. I know for my range use who cares, right? But what if...
Anywho. Any input? If I could get both I would. So that isn't an option.
I recently acquired a Vortex Strikefire in a trade to put on my tacticool AR-22 to replace a broken cheapo barska. I never was a fan of that style RDS or so I thought. Until I got it. I absolutely love it. I immediately wondered why I didn't just put it on my actual AR. It then had me wondering some more. Aimpoint PRO optics are decently priced. I am no operator and don't pretend to be one. I just like the idea of it's reliability and battery life to price point. Fairly impressive from the reviews and such. I like the look of micro dots quite a bit so making the change to that style would be mostly cosmetic hurtles for me. Just when I thought I figured it out and was going to charge it to my card.... I got to check out my friend's Vortex PTS 1-4x24. Yeah... now I don't know what I want.
I know they serve a different purpose and an RDS has advantages in some areas that low power variable scopes don't have. Easier to shoot from weird angles, faster close range acquisition, no eye box or eye relief. I have heard the argument for 1-4's also being at close range it is only slightly slower to acquire, you can obviously ID a target further (in my case very scary paper), more versatile in other ways etc. The issue is, price goes up and more things needed. Mounts are an added cost too. Are a low power variable really the "future" and replacements for RDS like some like to say? I can't seem to see how they would be. I also see them being quite a bit less durable. I know for my range use who cares, right? But what if...
Anywho. Any input? If I could get both I would. So that isn't an option.
Comment