I am in the market for an inexpensive bolt action rifle that I can have some fun with and play around with. I am not a hunter and for the most part will shoot it at the 200 yard mark which is the max distance at a range where I am a member. I would like a rifle capable of moa at 200 yards, not that I can do that but I would like to get there. There will be times that I will shoot it at longer distance, but I am primarily concerned with 200 yards.
I really like the Ruger American and have always had good luck with my other Ruger’s, and it is only$380. The drawback to this is that I would get this in either .308 or 30-06. Neither are cheap to shoot.
On the other hand, the Remington 700 ADL is available in .223 and runs about $480.00. I know the 700’s are nice guns, but I do not know the draw backs to the ADL versus other 700 models. The savings of buying 223 vs 308’s or 30-06 will cover the additional cost of the rifle pretty quick.
So … between the Ruger American chambered in .308 or 30-06 and the Remington 700 ADL chambers in .223, which do you think would be better suited for my desires listed above?
I really like the Ruger American and have always had good luck with my other Ruger’s, and it is only$380. The drawback to this is that I would get this in either .308 or 30-06. Neither are cheap to shoot.
On the other hand, the Remington 700 ADL is available in .223 and runs about $480.00. I know the 700’s are nice guns, but I do not know the draw backs to the ADL versus other 700 models. The savings of buying 223 vs 308’s or 30-06 will cover the additional cost of the rifle pretty quick.
So … between the Ruger American chambered in .308 or 30-06 and the Remington 700 ADL chambers in .223, which do you think would be better suited for my desires listed above?
Comment