SLR-106U

[sqhammer]

I know the SLR's are illegal in Ca. in the rifle form, but got to thinking. As the SLR-106U is a pistol, is it could it be legally owned here as long as it was retained in pistol form as it would no longer be an assault rifle? Forgive me if this has been covered elsewhere, but I could not find it anywhere else.

[victorr]

Unfortunately, all SLRs by name are banned.

http://oag.ca.gov/sites/all/files/pdfs/firearms/infobuls/kaslist.pdf?

[Quiet]

Due to the make/model designation, it is not recommended that you import/possess one in CA. (good luck finding a CA FFL dealer, if you try it)

Besides...
You can get a CA legal Century Arms/Zastava 7.62x39mm PAP M92 PV or 5.56x45mm PAP M85 PV for $300-400 less than the Arsenal SLR-106U.
You can also wait for Czechpoint to import the Czech Small Arms SA VZ58 pistol in 5.56x45mm and 7.62x39mm, which going by the MSRP is about $200-300 less than the Arsenal SLR-106U.


Arsenal SLR-106U


Century Arms/Zastava PAP M92 PV & PAP M85 PV


Czechpoint/Czech Small Arms SA VZ58 556 & SA VZ58 762

[victorr]

Riflegear had the M92 for a minute there ; )

[onelonehorseman]

Perhaps some expert here can help me understand the Kasler ban list just a little more. I understand that guns specifically listed are reportedly banned by name . . so how do so many CA gun shops, and sporting goods dealers, sell AR series Colt 6920LE and Colt sporters, which are also specifically listed? Does the addition of the bullet button/mag lock and low capacity magazine preempt Kasler since the guns is now considered a non-assault weapon? If that were the case, then why couldn't the same be said for others on the list like the Arsenal SLR 101?

[Dhena81]

Perhaps some expert here can help me understand the Kasler ban list just a little more. I understand that guns specifically listed are reportedly banned by name . . so how do so many CA gun shops, and sporting goods dealers, sell AR series Colt 6920LE and Colt sporters, which are also specifically listed? Does the addition of the bullet button/mag lock and low capacity magazine preempt Kasler since the guns is now considered a non-assault weapon? If that were the case, then why couldn't the same be said for others on the list like the Arsenal SLR 101?

No nothing exempts any new purchase firearm on the list unless you have a registered AW prior to the ban and No they do not sell what you speak of your mistaken.

[2600fromAtari]

Can one of the lawyers or someone from CGF weigh in? I don't see why this would be banned.

The SLR moniker is banned for rifles. This isn't a rifle, and there is no mention of Arsenal or SLR.

[onelonehorseman]

I have seen and examined Colt SP6920LE rifles for sale at more than one major sporting goods chain in So. Cal. Their tag lists an internal part number that they use on their paperwork when they DROS it, but if you have them bring one out, it is marked SP6920LE on the box. The Colt 6920LE is named on the Kasler list. ......not meaning to be argumentative; just trying to understand the difference between this and other guns on the list.

[Dhena81]

I have seen and examined Colt SP6920LE rifles for sale at more than one major sporting goods chain in So. Cal. Their tag lists an internal part number that they use on their paperwork when they DROS it, but if you have them bring one out, it is marked SP6920LE on the box. The Colt 6920LE is named on the Kasler list. ......not meaning to be argumentative; just trying to understand the difference between this and other guns on the list.

The first thing you need to understand is the AR your talking about the lower receiver is the registered part.

The second thing is the only difference between banned rifle that you didnt own before the list and a legally purchased rifle is the roll marks on the lower receiver.

So if the your buying a colt that is a 6920LE or a 6920 sporter your not going to be buying it in CA.

The legal 6920 has a m4 carbine stamped lower receiver all 3 are exactly the same rifle with different markings on the lower receiver its really that simple.

[P.W.]

Can one of the lawyers or someone from CGF weigh in? I don't see why this would be banned.

The SLR moniker is banned for rifles. This isn't a rifle, and there is no mention of Arsenal or SLR.

That is a very good point and true. Nowhere in the list of banned make/models does it state "SLR".

As used in this chapter, "assault weapon" shall mean the following
designated semiautomatic firearms:
(b) All of the following specified pistols:
(1) UZI*
(2) Encom MP-9 and MP-45.
(3) The following MAC types:
(A) RPB Industries Inc. sM10 and M11.
(B) SWD Incorporated M-11.
(C) Advance Armament Inc. M-11.
(D) Military Armament Corp. Ingram M-11.
(4) Intratec TEC-9.
(5) Sites Spectre.
(6) Sterling MK-7.
(7) Calico M-950.
(8) Bushmaster Pistol.

[onelonehorseman]

The first thing you need to understand is the AR your talking about the lower receiver is the registered part.

The second thing is the only difference between banned rifle that you didnt own before the list and a legally purchased rifle is the roll marks on the lower receiver.

So if the your buying a colt that is a 6920LE or a 6920 sporter your not going to be buying it in CA.

The legal 6920 has a m4 carbine stamped lower receiver all 3 are exactly the same rifle with different markings on the lower receiver its really that simple.

Ahh, okay, that makes sense. So as long as the banned name is not on the receiver it's okay? Yes, the ones I have seen say M4 Carbine on the receiver. Only the packaging says 6920LE.

Thanks for the explanation. I knew someone here would know the answer.

[onelonehorseman]

That is a very good point and true. Nowhere in the list of banned make/models does it state "SLR".

Arsenal SLR(all) and SLG(all) are specifically named on the Kasler list of banned rifles. They are listed under the AK Series Weapons on page 13 of the CA Firearms Laws.

http://oag.ca.gov/sites/all/files/pdfs/firearms/forms/Cfl2007.pdf

http://oag.ca.gov/sites/all/files/pdfs/firearms/infobuls/kaslist.pdf

[P.W.]

Arsenal SLR(all) and SLG(all) are specifically named on the Kasler list of banned rifles. They are listed under the AK Series Weapons on page 13 of the CA Firearms Laws.

http://oag.ca.gov/sites/all/files/pdfs/firearms/forms/Cfl2007.pdf

http://oag.ca.gov/sites/all/files/pd...ls/kaslist.pdf

Those models are only listed under banned "Rifles", the SLR106U is an AK Pistol.

I already know that those models are banned by name as "Rifles". Did you not read my entire post and see that I was speaking about "SLR" not being on the banned handgun list ?

[victorr]

Bringing this back up. Does anyone have a definitive answer regarding the Arsenal SLR106U being legal and DROSing fine since it is a pistol?

[2600fromAtari]

I am not a lawyer, so take it for what it's worth, but I say it's fine. Again, no mention of Arsenal or SLR for pistols. This is NOT a rifle.

Oh, and my FFL agrees with me.