Never mind

[brianm767]

Never mind

[manuelcardenas77]

Sound like some morons are in some deep stuff!

[jdberger]

Don't police use the spaghetti on the wall approach when charging? If so, then charging for the MAK would be par for the course, no? Then it's for one of the 58 DAs to figure out.

BTW- this all factors into CGF's Richards lawsuits.

[Mssr. Eleganté]

...Says they got high caps but can't do any thing about that unless the guys say the wrong things?

Yep. There is no law banning possession of those mags. So unless the person with the mags says the wrong things, like admitting to manufacturing or importing the mags after 2000, they can't be charged.

[Bobula]

I'm sure he really appreciates you posting this on a public forum. An attorney would never be able to find this post and use it as evidence.

[brianm767]

I'm sure he really appreciates you posting this on a public forum. An attorney would never be able to find this post and use it as evidence.

Yah your probably right.

[Bobula]

Its far better to always leave it hypothetical or a friends friend.

[brianm767]

Its far better to always leave it hypothetical or a friends friend.

I'll ask some hypothetical questions later, thanks for the heads up.