Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Would this be legal: Stuffing the internals of a BDM 30 round mag into a pre-ban body

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mxpatriot51
    Member
    • Feb 2007
    • 332

    Would this be legal: Stuffing the internals of a BDM 30 round mag into a pre-ban body

    Bought a Ceiner kit awhile ago and I love it, it's just a pain the butt being stuck with ten rounds.

    Would it be legal if you "built" a 30 round Ceiner mag out of a pre-ban .223 magazine body? Basically, you stuff the ceiner or BDM parts into the pre-ban body.

    Would that still be considered pre-ban, even though the internals are now different?

    I've always thought "once a high cap, always a high cap", meaning if I could modify an 11 round magazine to hold 100 rounds, that's fine, since it was already a legal high cap. Is this true?
  • #2
    bobfried
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2005
    • 1448

    What you say is partially true, once a high cap always a high cap.

    But the rub is in the converting them to load a different caliber in a completely different class of weapon. By your reasoning I could convert any of my high capacity magazines to any other weapon and caliber. You go from having ZERO high capacity 22lr. magazine into having ONE 22lr. high capacity magazine, that's manufacturing, no ways around it.
    Last edited by bobfried; 11-30-2007, 8:44 AM.

    Comment

    • #3
      mxpatriot51
      Member
      • Feb 2007
      • 332

      Originally posted by bobfried
      What you say is partially true, once a high cap always a high cap.

      But the rub is in the converting them to load a different caliber in a completely different class of weapon. By your reasoning I could convert any of my high capacity magazines to any other weapon and caliber. You go from having ZERO high capacity 22lr. magazine into having ONE 22lr. high capacity magazine, that's manufacturing, no ways around it.
      That's a good point, but how is it different then using a .223 magazine for something like 6.8SPC? What if you change the follower and put something else in it?

      At what point is the line between "modified existing magazine" and "created new magazine".

      Comment

      • #4
        NSR500
        Banned
        • Aug 2006
        • 19530

        I'd like to know the answer to this as well... As far as I understand; "Once a High Capacity, always a High Capacity". So, If you already own a legal High Capacity Magazine; what does it matter what caliber it is?

        Comment

        • #5
          rksimple
          Calguns Addict
          • Jan 2006
          • 6257

          I thought it had to be able to be used in the same firearm after changing parts. It's the same lower, so is it the same firearm? Does caliber matter? Also waiting for a good answer...
          GAP Team Shooter 5

          Comment

          • #6
            darkest2000
            Senior Member
            • Oct 2006
            • 1400

            As long as you don't MODIFY any of the parts, there's no laws that say anything about that being illegal...

            You're not creating new hicaps, you're just changing the caliber.

            But, generally speaking if you gotta ask, don't do it. Or keep it to yourself.
            www.collectordesignwerks.com

            Comment

            • #7
              Boomer1961
              Senior Member
              • Nov 2005
              • 768

              Originally posted by rksimple
              I thought it had to be able to be used in the same firearm after changing parts. It's the same lower, so is it the same firearm? Does caliber matter? Also waiting for a good answer...
              I don't think the DOJ has put out a memo/cirular letter on this.

              The BATFE put out a circular letter on the now expired Clinton ban that did say the magazine had to still function in the weapon it was designed for.

              Now this gets me to thinking since that letter did not address ammo caliber that it is still designed to funcition in the weapon it was made for, just in a different caliber.

              I would think though that falling back on the old Federal interpretation might be good legal standing until the DOJ clarifies.

              Comment

              • #8
                bwiese
                I need a LIFE!!
                • Oct 2005
                • 27621

                I think Boomer's advice generally good about prior ATF stances as guides.

                I think any mag stuff you're thinking about SHOULD ALWAYS ALLOW THE MAG TO FUNCTION IN THE EXISTING CALIBER+FIREARM FOR WHICH IT'S DESIGNED.

                If it happens to feed ammo of another caliber in another gun OK (40cal HK USP40 mags in an HK USP9, for example) that's "just the way it is", and it's indeed a hicap mag.

                Bill Wiese
                San Jose, CA

                CGF Board Member / NRA Benefactor Life Member / CRPA life member
                sigpic
                No postings of mine here, unless otherwise specifically noted, are
                to be construed as formal or informal positions of the Calguns.Net
                ownership, The Calguns Foundation, Inc. ("CGF"), the NRA, or my
                employer. No posts of mine on Calguns are to be construed as
                legal advice, which can only be given by a lawyer.

                Comment

                • #9
                  mxpatriot51
                  Member
                  • Feb 2007
                  • 332

                  Originally posted by bwiese
                  I think Boomer's advice generally good about prior ATF stances as guides.

                  I think any mag stuff you're thinking about SHOULD ALWAYS ALLOW THE MAG TO FUNCTION IN THE EXISTING CALIBER+FIREARM FOR WHICH IT'S DESIGNED.

                  If it happens to feed ammo of another caliber in another gun OK (40cal HK USP40 mags in an HK USP9, for example) that's "just the way it is", and it's indeed a hicap mag.
                  You mean high cap .40 mags,right? Because if you put more than ten rounds in a ten round magazine, isn't that making it a high cap, regardless of its intended use?

                  As for the BDM/pre-ban body swap I'm not planning on doing that at this point, I'm just trying to figure out if it can be legally done, and if so, how.

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    mxpatriot51
                    Member
                    • Feb 2007
                    • 332

                    In a similar question: Was there very a ruling on the whole 10 round .50 Beowulf/30 round .223 magazine thing?

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    UA-8071174-1