Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Featureless question

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • justjeff
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2011
    • 1301

    Featureless question

    If I put a monster man grip on my rifle could I remove the BB and use my preban 20rnd mags

    Thanks in advance

    Originally posted by LBDamned
    Serious people make real change in their lives... Others complain on forums.
  • #2
    G-forceJunkie
    Calguns Addict
    • Jul 2010
    • 6315

    Yes. Does a MM grip work with that stock?

    Comment

    • #3
      incredablehefey
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2010
      • 1853

      yep in the configuration in the pic

      just my opinion,i like exile machine better than the monster man
      "The need in public and private life is common sense, decency, courage." - President Roosevelt

      Comment

      • #4
        justjeff
        Senior Member
        • Aug 2011
        • 1301

        Thanks for the fast response. You guys rock! I was going to take a piece of cardboard make a template of the empty space between the stock and grip. Then mold some fiberglass and resin to an old grip. Idk yet just checking my options. Thanks again!!!!
        Originally posted by LBDamned
        Serious people make real change in their lives... Others complain on forums.

        Comment

        • #5
          DannyInSoCal
          Calguns Addict
          • Aug 2010
          • 8271

          Gotta fix the stock so the length can't be adjusted - And from what I remember you need to run a brake....

          Just buy a HammerHead - It's the best option...
          .
          $500 Donation to any Veterans Charity - Plus $500 Gift Card to any gun store: Visit 2nd Amendment Mortgage / www.2AMortgage.com

          Comment

          • #6
            Grumpyoldretiredcop
            Calguns Addict
            • Sep 2008
            • 6437

            Originally posted by DannyInSoCal
            Gotta fix the stock so the length can't be adjusted
            True

            Originally posted by DannyInSoCal
            And from what I remember you need to run a brake....
            Observe the photo. There's no muzzle device present, no need to add a brake. The OP just cannot add a flash hider if he wants to keep the rifle featureless.
            I'm retired. That's right, retired. I don't want to hear about the cop who stopped you today or how you didn't think you should get a ticket. That just makes me grumpy!

            Comment

            • #7
              dieselpower
              Banned
              • Jan 2009
              • 11471

              That stock is not a feature... so it doesn't need anything done to it...

              the law says...
              C) A folding or telescoping stock

              It doesn't neither of those two things. You would need to make sure your new grip didn't create a hole that could be defined as a thumb hole.

              I also agree the HammerHead grip would be a better way to go with that stock.

              Comment

              • #8
                Exile Machine
                No longer in Business
                CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                • Oct 2009
                • 9551

                Just FYI, the Hammerhead with a PRS is not going to let you wrap your hand around the grip. The PRS will block your thumb from going over unless you have paper-thin thumbs.

                Last edited by Exile Machine; 09-02-2011, 10:16 AM.
                Manufacturer of CA AWB Compliance Products from Oct 2009 to Nov 2018

                Comment

                • #9
                  Tzvia
                  Senior Member
                  • Apr 2006
                  • 602

                  I ran a Monsterman on that stock a few years ago but the 'jury' was still out on the stock being telescoping/folding. I guess the argument was that it did change length. But technically it does not telescope nor does it fold.

                  If the current consensus is that it is GTG without pinning I might switch back to my Monsterman. It worked well on that stock and felt good on the bench . It does leave a very small gap that is higher than the top of the exposed trigger, but it is too small to put my tiny thumb in, I can't even get my pinky in there. One could always fill the space with Epoxy if it was a concern. And I still can't get how people reach the conclusion that a hole is created when two separate parts that have a notch are placed against each other. It is not a hole if it is two parts - a hole is an opening that is enclosed on all sides-and that does not exist IMO if you have two separate parts no matter how close together they are. They are still two separate parts. Or is there a shifty legal definition here...
                  Tzvia

                  RIP Kelev my sweet Lab (and avatar). The best dog in the known universe. Thank you for 14 wonderful years. I will see you again one day.

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    C_1
                    Senior Member
                    • Jun 2008
                    • 1504

                    Throw a MMG, HH, or kydex grip wrap on it, and use them 20s. An ambi safety is a good idea as well.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      tacticalcity
                      I need a LIFE!!
                      • Aug 2006
                      • 10916

                      Originally posted by dieselpower
                      That stock is not a feature... so it doesn't need anything done to it...

                      the law says...
                      C) A folding or telescoping stock

                      It doesn't neither of those two things. You would need to make sure your new grip didn't create a hole that could be defined as a thumb hole.

                      I also agree the HammerHead grip would be a better way to go with that stock.
                      People are always reading more into the law than is actually there. Very common and very annoying. But human nature.

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        ke6guj
                        Moderator
                        CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                        • Nov 2003
                        • 23725

                        Originally posted by dieselpower
                        That stock is not a feature... so it doesn't need anything done to it...

                        the law says...
                        C) A folding or telescoping stock

                        It doesn't neither of those two things.
                        the law says telescoping. It could be argued that the steel rods that are attached to the buttplate telescope into/out of the stock body. do you have a legal definition of telescoping that would show that it doesn't apply to a PRS stock?
                        Jack



                        Do you want an AOW or C&R SBS/SBR in CA?

                        No posts of mine are to be construed as legal advice, which can only be given by a lawyer.

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          jrr
                          Senior Member
                          • Aug 2009
                          • 620

                          Not to threadjack, but.... is that a .223 or .308; and where did you get that side charging upper? That's freakin sweet!

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            generalpetres
                            Senior Member
                            • Sep 2009
                            • 787

                            Originally posted by jrr
                            Not to threadjack, but.... is that a .223 or .308; and where did you get that side charging upper? That's freakin sweet!
                            its a 223 not 308, you can tell by the magwell. as for the side charging upper theres acouple different brands floating around. here is one from Mega
                            and here's the brand the op has from LAR Grizzly

                            also nice rifle btw
                            Last edited by generalpetres; 09-02-2011, 12:19 PM.
                            NRA Member

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              justjeff
                              Senior Member
                              • Aug 2011
                              • 1301

                              Originally posted by jrr
                              Not to threadjack, but.... is that a .223 or .308; and where did you get that side charging upper? That's freakin sweet!
                              This is a lar grizzly got it from element arms. Its something different.
                              Originally posted by LBDamned
                              Serious people make real change in their lives... Others complain on forums.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1