High caps are a completely different issue from registered assault weapons.
Registered assault weapons are, well, registered.
If you didn't have it pre-ban, you couldn't register it later, and you can not transfer a RAW to anyone inside of California other than an FFL that has an AW permit.
Unlike high-caps, there is no legal way for a civilian to possess an assault weapon that they did not register during the grace period, and also unlike high-caps, where the crime is manufacture or importation, with a statute of limitations of 36 months, mere possession of an unregistered assault weapon is a continuing crime. The statute of limitations would begin counting down the day that the person in possession either sold the gun out of state or destroyed the receiver.
BUT....
The law does not require that you carry your registration paperwork with you. If a cop believes that it is an illegal gun, they can (and will) run the serial number. The serial number will come back as a RAW, and with the name of the person it is registered to.
That doesn't mean that it's "wrong" for a range to want to see paperwork. If it's policy, it's policy. They have the right to refuse service to anyone for any reason other than the few classes that are protected by anti-discrimination laws.
But the above poster's example about his conversation with the Albany cop is a perfect example of why WE should not "shoot first and ask questions later" when we see what we believe to be an illegal weapon at the range. Sure, if you see an 18 year old who arrived with a group of people of the same age and you see him drop a high cap from an AR and it's not an AR-22, ya... you are most likely seeing an illegal weapon. OTOH, if the guy's father is standing behind the line, it may very well be 100% legal with the gun registered to dad.
Registered assault weapons are, well, registered.
If you didn't have it pre-ban, you couldn't register it later, and you can not transfer a RAW to anyone inside of California other than an FFL that has an AW permit.
Unlike high-caps, there is no legal way for a civilian to possess an assault weapon that they did not register during the grace period, and also unlike high-caps, where the crime is manufacture or importation, with a statute of limitations of 36 months, mere possession of an unregistered assault weapon is a continuing crime. The statute of limitations would begin counting down the day that the person in possession either sold the gun out of state or destroyed the receiver.
BUT....
The law does not require that you carry your registration paperwork with you. If a cop believes that it is an illegal gun, they can (and will) run the serial number. The serial number will come back as a RAW, and with the name of the person it is registered to.
That doesn't mean that it's "wrong" for a range to want to see paperwork. If it's policy, it's policy. They have the right to refuse service to anyone for any reason other than the few classes that are protected by anti-discrimination laws.
But the above poster's example about his conversation with the Albany cop is a perfect example of why WE should not "shoot first and ask questions later" when we see what we believe to be an illegal weapon at the range. Sure, if you see an 18 year old who arrived with a group of people of the same age and you see him drop a high cap from an AR and it's not an AR-22, ya... you are most likely seeing an illegal weapon. OTOH, if the guy's father is standing behind the line, it may very well be 100% legal with the gun registered to dad.





Comment