Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

White Oak vs. BCM

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Eargasm
    Senior Member
    • Jul 2009
    • 611

    White Oak vs. BCM

    I'm looking at purchasing a 20" inch upper.

    What are your opinions on the White Oak Armament versus the BCM 20" upper?

    I'm looking for something that I can use at approx 500 yards for target/precision practice. Is one better than the other?

    Thanks.
  • #2
    Brown Rock
    Veteran Member
    • May 2009
    • 4506

    Both look to have good specs. If you decide on the BCM, you might be waiting a long time for it. Those have been out of stock for awhile now. I looked into getting one in January, but they were out of them. Another thing about the BCM upper is they don't include the BCG, or charging handle.
    Fernando became an American the courageous way. By outrunning the speed boat.

    Comment

    • #3
      tm_jones123
      Banned
      • Nov 2009
      • 121

      To my understanding (so take it as such) BCM is built more battlefield while WO is more competition based.

      Comment

      • #4
        RawImpact
        Senior Member
        • Oct 2009
        • 721

        for precision/target go WOA

        **If i am missing a location or want to edit a location, PM me!**

        Comment

        • #5
          killshot44
          Veteran Member
          • Nov 2009
          • 4072

          Blah, BCM bought their hammer-forged barrels from Sabre Defence and now they get them elsewhere source them from Daniel Defense,
          or so I'm told . And they are all chrome lined.

          White Oak uses stainless barrels that are cut or button-rifled, stress-relieved and hand-lapped. You can request a maker (Krieger, Broughton, Hart etc). Even their Douglas and Wilson barrels are great. They sell barrel/bolt combos or complete Uppers.

          You can buy what the Service Rifle/Match Rifle/High Power match winners use or you can say you bought from "the chart". Up to you.
          Last edited by killshot44; 04-03-2011, 1:10 AM.

          Comment

          • #6
            vintagearms
            Calguns Addict
            • Jan 2009
            • 6841

            Originally posted by killshot44
            Blah, BCM bought their hammer-forged barrels from Sabre Defence and now they have to get them elsewhere.

            White Oak uses barrels that are better-rifled, stress-relieved and hand-lapped. You can request a maker (Krieger, Broughton, etc). They sell barrel/bolt combos or complete Uppers.

            You can buy what the Service Rifle/Match Rifle/High Power match winners use or you can say you bought from "the chart". Up to you.
            BCM now gets them from DD.

            To the OP, I'd look at the WO barrels for what your lookinjg for.

            Comment

            • #7
              a1fabweld
              Veteran Member
              • Mar 2008
              • 4612

              Make sure you are comparing apples to apples. Stainless for stainless that is. I have a WOA SDMR barrel that is ridiculously accurate. Chrome lined & precision shooting don't mix.
              Liberals could fk up an anvil

              Comment

              • #8
                Packy14
                Calguns Addict
                • Jul 2008
                • 5312

                WOA and WOP are considered to be in a class above most builders for what they are..target uppers. BCM makes affordable mil-spec like combat uppers (they aren't actually milspec from what I've seen since I don't think they have a contract). BCM isn't even as accurate as a full DD build...so... ya... WOA.
                NRA Lifetime Member

                1A-2A = -1A

                Comment

                • #9
                  lumpia
                  Member
                  • Nov 2007
                  • 178

                  Originally posted by kenshinoro2007
                  (they aren't actually milspec from what I've seen since I don't think they have a contract). BCM isn't even as accurate as a full DD build...so... ya... WOA.

                  What is your basis for these statements regarding BCM? Any hard data?

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    phish
                    Veteran Member
                    • Jan 2006
                    • 3089

                    which one is better for shtf or zombie hunting?

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      Brown Rock
                      Veteran Member
                      • May 2009
                      • 4506

                      Originally posted by kenshinoro2007
                      BCM makes affordable mil-spec like combat uppers (they aren't actually milspec from what I've seen since I don't think they have a contract).
                      BCM ain't milspec because they don't have a military contract? I always thought milspec meant that the materials used met military specifications.
                      Fernando became an American the courageous way. By outrunning the speed boat.

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        Packy14
                        Calguns Addict
                        • Jul 2008
                        • 5312

                        they can call it milspec, but unless its actually tested to be so by an independent party, who knows what it is. There have been many documented issues with their bolt carriers and other parts not being up to par. To each his own, spend your money where you like, but if your interest is target/precision shooting, I'd personally take a WOA over a BCM 100% of the time. Something that is not actually used by the military cannot truly be milspec.





                        Sorry to burst your bubble.
                        Last edited by Packy14; 04-03-2011, 2:14 AM.
                        NRA Lifetime Member

                        1A-2A = -1A

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          Brown Rock
                          Veteran Member
                          • May 2009
                          • 4506

                          Originally posted by kenshinoro2007
                          they can call it milspec, but unless its actually tested to be so by an independent party, who knows what it is. There have been many documented issues with their bolt carriers and other parts not being up to par. To each his own, spend your money where you like, but if your interest is target/precision shooting, I'd personally take a WOA over a BCM 100% of the time. Something that is not actually used by the military cannot truly be milspec.





                          Sorry to burst your bubble.
                          Interesting. Looks like I got my lesson of the day.
                          Fernando became an American the courageous way. By outrunning the speed boat.

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            Packy14
                            Calguns Addict
                            • Jul 2008
                            • 5312

                            no worries, BCM is fine for what it is, and better than many of the other commercial builders. I like their gunfighter charging handle too. I'd probably buy a BCM upper one over a true "milspec" builder's uppers like Colt. But..going back to the OP's question, the WOA or WOP uppers are probably more cut out for what he wants. I know I want a WOA if I follow through with my ideas to shoot highpower.
                            NRA Lifetime Member

                            1A-2A = -1A

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              MrPlink
                              I need a LIFE!!
                              • Mar 2010
                              • 12532

                              Originally posted by kenshinoro2007
                              BCM makes affordable mil-spec like combat uppers (they aren't actually milspec from what I've seen since I don't think they have a contract).
                              milspec isnt based on contracts

                              and your first link actually contradicts your next one

                              taken right from your wiki link

                              " Standardization is beneficial in achieving interoperability, ensuring products meet certain requirements, commonality, reliability, total cost of ownership, compatibility with logistics systems, and similar defense-related objectives .
                              Defense standards are also used by other non-defense government organizations, technical organizations, and industry."

                              Im not sure where you gathered from that that they meant to say "only colt, fn, KAC, LMT, etc etc are milspec"
                              Last edited by MrPlink; 04-03-2011, 6:52 AM.
                              The California Moderate Centrist Militia member in exile

                              disclaimer:
                              everything I post is for arguendo and entertainment purposes only, and should not be construed to be legal advice

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1