LMT piston vs LWRCi piston

[rb0331]

Any opinions? Pros/Cons?

[locosway]

From what I've been reading both are great and you can't go wrong with either. If you have a LMT lower you could get a LMT upper so they "match", but personally I sort of like the LWRC's for some reason.

[HK Dave]

You'll be fine with either.

[rb0331]

I've heard great things about both. Just looking for some details on them and people who have them. I.E. felt recoil, accuracy, longevity????

[santacruzstefan]

I've read in one review that the LMT had a very slight recoil, almost on par with gas guns. Both are nice; I had an LWRC, loved it, very accurate... but I sold it. It was too expensive, nice though it was. My next AR is going to be an MRP CQB, but gas. I think I'm done with the piston thing. Although, good thing about LMT, you can easily switch between them. Also, now ppl are cutting custom barrels to fit the MRP platform, which is really sweet. Thats where my money is.

[BHPFan]

Although, good thing about LMT, you can easily switch between them. Also, now ppl are cutting custom barrels to fit the MRP platform, which is really sweet. Thats where my money is.

+1

IMHO, that is the one big advantage of LMT over LWRC: the versatility that you can easily switch between DI and GP in the same upper.

[IsaacGlass]

LMT all the way. Dont buy something you cannot afford, the resale market these days is slow and you will lose 10-20% on the dollar.

[xenophobe]

I've been a fanboy of LMT for a long time. I would say go LMT.

They manufactured receivers for Pac West Arms way back in the day.