Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

What's the deal with Universal M1 Carbines?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #16
    wingnut948
    Member
    • Apr 2008
    • 120

    I agree with Fate and K-101. My first carbine was a later model Universal with the 2 recoil springs and I had a lot of misfeeds.

    I got rid of that one and got one of the IAIs with the "Made in Spain" receivers and it worked perfectly. It still wasn't the "real thing", so I sold that one and now I have an IBM and a Saginaw. The only time I ever had a misfeed with either one was when I reassembled a magazine with the spring in backwards. Go USGI and you won't regret it
    I love it when a plan comes together.

    Comment

    • #17
      gun toting monkeyboy
      Calguns Addict
      • Aug 2008
      • 6820

      I have one. I got it because it was cheap, and I was a starving student. It runs just fine. My guess is that it is probably an older one. If you can get a GI or a new one, go ahead. Why risk getting a junky one?
      Originally posted by aplinker
      It's OK not to post when you have no clue what you're talking about.

      Comment

      • #18
        smle-man
        I need a LIFE!!
        • Jan 2007
        • 10551

        I watched a guy at the range on Monday shooting one; his jammed about every other round and he was using a screw driver to pry the fired cases out of the chamber. Looked like a lot of work to me. Universal carbines were known as bad news back in the 70s when I bought a Plainfield instead which worked just fine.

        Comment

        • #19
          kendog4570
          Calguns Addict
          • Dec 2008
          • 5160

          Some early Universals were close to USGI because they used a lot of scrap Govt. parts.
          Good luck finding parts for one of the late production ones. They are total crap.

          Comment

          • #20
            buffybuster
            Veteran Member
            • Oct 2005
            • 2615

            As stated, the early Universals were made mostly of surplus USGI parts and were pretty decent. As the surplus part % went down, so did the reliability. When they went to the two recoil springs and the stamped op-rod, those are the ones that gave Universal the terrible reputation.......for good reason. By that time, their design had diverged so far from the USGI that it's really another firearm.
            Luck favors the prepared.

            The original battle plan did not survive initial contact with the enemy.

            "The things that will destroy America are prosperity at any price, peace at any price, safety first instead of duty first, the love of soft living and the get rich quick theory of life." -Theodore Roosevelt

            Comment

            • #21
              drummerdude1188
              Senior Member
              • Jan 2008
              • 792

              Originally posted by buffybuster
              By that time, their design had diverged so far from the USGI that it's really another firearm.

              Mine has a metal top hg as well, not a wood one. looks like the heat shield on the mossberg 590's, with the holes. Just more deviation from the original. although i do kinda like the look of it (puts flame suit on)

              Comment

              • #22
                deadcoyote
                Veteran Member
                • Apr 2010
                • 4002

                I had a universal. It was a jamomatic. To be fair to universal, I bought it heavily used for about $200 so who knows how many prior bubba mods or what-not had been performed on their product.
                Buying a safe and sane firework is like paying a hooker for a hug. I do not see the appeal in it.

                Comment

                Working...
                UA-8071174-1