If you are trying to accurize both rifles, M-1A takes a lot more effort to modify. In recent years, AR's are winning the national match (cross the course) competitions, and long range matches in many instances. Of course the AR's in that instances are accurized and use non factory heavy bullets.
There are people who cannot shoot AR's, though. I shot expert in the USMC with M-16's. But, I have shot M-1A's for matches for many years and cannot shoot AR's comfortably in different positions. I always end up going back to M-1A. I have a new, unfired Compass Lake Engineering rifle that is sitting in the safe. I bought it last year, but decided not to shoot it, again because I couldn't feel comfortable with it. I may have to get rid of it.
Comparing AR and M-1A is like comparing apples and oranges, in my opinion. In my experience and testing for the past several years, the rifles shoot about the same out of the box. They use different ammo and have different spec. Do you like a Ford or Chevy?
There are people who cannot shoot AR's, though. I shot expert in the USMC with M-16's. But, I have shot M-1A's for matches for many years and cannot shoot AR's comfortably in different positions. I always end up going back to M-1A. I have a new, unfired Compass Lake Engineering rifle that is sitting in the safe. I bought it last year, but decided not to shoot it, again because I couldn't feel comfortable with it. I may have to get rid of it.
Comparing AR and M-1A is like comparing apples and oranges, in my opinion. In my experience and testing for the past several years, the rifles shoot about the same out of the box. They use different ammo and have different spec. Do you like a Ford or Chevy?




Legislators tend to overlook it.

Comment