Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

The Grip Pod System, is it a Viable Option for Your Tactical Carbine?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #46
    Group B
    Member
    • Nov 2008
    • 490

    Originally posted by Group B
    Now they make a GPS-249, and the legs are still aluminum, but the handle is now polymer...what gives? Was the GPS-01 too heavy?
    Nobody here knows the answer to this?
    "I intend to go in harm's way.... I have a fighting ship and I will never retreat from an enemy force..."

    - CDR E.E. Evans, USN, October 27, 1943
    at USS Johnston's commissioning

    Comment

    • #47
      killshot44
      Veteran Member
      • Nov 2009
      • 4072

      Use your Search-Foo


      (Google: Grip-Pod)

      Comment

      • #48
        WeekendWarrior
        Veteran Member
        • Dec 2008
        • 3536

        My one complain is the overall size of the grip-pod. Clearly it is the right size for the application it is meant for, but if you shoot mostly at ranges I think it make more sense to get a harris bopod or something similar you can take on and off the rifle as you please and have a normal vertical foregrip. Now if I owned a SCAR, I would probably mount one of these for funsies.

        Wow, $48 is a steal, I'll take one for that! hahaha
        Last edited by WeekendWarrior; 12-16-2009, 2:43 PM.
        sigpic
        in the hands of
        OH MY!

        Comment

        • #49
          cal3gunner
          Senior Member
          • Jun 2008
          • 1629

          ,,,
          Last edited by cal3gunner; 09-11-2013, 9:29 AM.

          Comment

          Working...
          UA-8071174-1