There has been a lot of interest in the attachable/non-detachable mag lock for the AR. The old AK mag lock solution requires ammo to be loaded through the action. This is not desirable with an AK. The ability to remove a 10rd mag (with the use of a tool) to load is desirable and safer.
Here is an idea for a mag lock for the AK. It is a single machined piece of Aluminum that would prevent (block) the mag release lever from being actuated by hand. There is a small slot that can be used with the use of a tool (not a bullet) to release the mag. This part would be attached to the trigger guard with one screw. Unfortunately, there does not appear to be any way of avoiding drilling one small hole in the trigger guard. (see pics)


Another additional option is a modification to the mag latch that creates a receiver with a NON-attachable/NON-detachable mag. The mag could only be attached or detached with a tool in the same way as described above with the addition of a feature on the latch that defeats the spring for attachment.
Granted the new interpretation of the law does not require a non-attachable feature, but may be a less risky option. (see pic)

Should these modifications be attempted? Are there any suggestions? Is there any interest in such a part?
Here is an idea for a mag lock for the AK. It is a single machined piece of Aluminum that would prevent (block) the mag release lever from being actuated by hand. There is a small slot that can be used with the use of a tool (not a bullet) to release the mag. This part would be attached to the trigger guard with one screw. Unfortunately, there does not appear to be any way of avoiding drilling one small hole in the trigger guard. (see pics)


Another additional option is a modification to the mag latch that creates a receiver with a NON-attachable/NON-detachable mag. The mag could only be attached or detached with a tool in the same way as described above with the addition of a feature on the latch that defeats the spring for attachment.
Granted the new interpretation of the law does not require a non-attachable feature, but may be a less risky option. (see pic)

Should these modifications be attempted? Are there any suggestions? Is there any interest in such a part?
Comment