Got the answer I was looking for. Thanks guys.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
...
Collapse
X
-
Tags: None
-
California doesn't use the term "Flash Can" or "Flash Hider."I'm building an AR and want to use a flash can. It doesn't hide the flash, just forces it forward but would that still be considered a flashhider? I can't find anything in the current law that names flashcans as illegal but maybe someone out there who knows something about this can enlighten me . TIA
A "Flash Suppressor" is defined in Title 11 of the California Code of Regulations, section 5471 as follows:
Please note that a "Flash Suppressor" is not illegal to possess. However if one is attached to a centerfire rifle having a detachable magazine, then the weapon becomes an "Assault Weapon."
Since the "Flash Can" directs the flash forward, it would have the effect of reducing the flash visible to the shooter and would therefore be a "Flash Suppressor."If you build a man a fire, you'll keep him warm for the evening. If you set a man on fire, you'll keep him warm for the rest of his life.Comment
-
Thanks !! I appreciate your help.California doesn't use the term "Flash Can" or "Flash Hider."
A "Flash Suppressor" is defined in Title 11 of the California Code of Regulations, section 5471 as follows:
Please note that a "Flash Suppressor" is not illegal to possess. However if one is attached to a centerfire rifle having a detachable magazine, then the weapon becomes an "Assault Weapon."
Since the "Flash Can" directs the flash forward, it would have the effect of reducing the flash visible to the shooter and would therefore be a "Flash Suppressor."Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,867,649
Posts: 25,138,881
Members: 358,387
Active Members: 5,643
Welcome to our newest member, LakeLife.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 13184 users online. 132 members and 13052 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 10:39 PM on 02-14-2026.

Comment