It`s kind of hard to keep up with the development in CA legislature, I would appreciate it if someone could chime in. A few years back it was perfectly OK to build an AK if it was compliant with CA requirements.
The reason I`m asking is, I came across this article:
Now, that person was a convicted felon, so he was prohibited from owning firearms and ammunition anyway, but the second charge was for "attempted possession and manufacture of the banned firearm", despite the fact that it was "a box of parts for the semiautomatic rifle and a receiver he had prepared for assembly, then pulled up an instructional website on his computer screen".
Well he might have had the original military select fire fcg, so my question is whether building CA compliant AK`s is still legal.
The reason I`m asking is, I came across this article:
Now, that person was a convicted felon, so he was prohibited from owning firearms and ammunition anyway, but the second charge was for "attempted possession and manufacture of the banned firearm", despite the fact that it was "a box of parts for the semiautomatic rifle and a receiver he had prepared for assembly, then pulled up an instructional website on his computer screen".
Well he might have had the original military select fire fcg, so my question is whether building CA compliant AK`s is still legal.

Comment