Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Pretty cool 9mm AR Magwell Conversion

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #16
    spfabrication
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2015
    • 1045

    Originally posted by Devilmonkey89
    When they were first created it was solid machined aluminum. If it's a plastic body then meh.
    "Each kit ships with polymer magwell blocks mated to a steel fixed ejector, a mag-cutting guide, and a hex key for press fitting the magwell blocks in position."

    ​from their site

    for 75$ your'e better off buying a lower that has a replaceable ejector and uses unmodified mags.
    Last edited by spfabrication; 12-11-2017, 8:19 PM.
    GO NAVY

    Comment

    • #17
      Devilmonkey89
      Senior Member
      • Sep 2013
      • 1539

      Originally posted by Devilmonkey89
      When they were first created it was solid machined aluminum. If it's a plastic body then meh.
      I guess i should have said "when they showed their prototype"
      Originally posted by spfabrication
      "Each kit ships with polymer magwell blocks mated to a steel fixed ejector, a mag-cutting guide, and a hex key for press fitting the magwell blocks in position."

      ​from their site
      Understood, now it's polymer construction. The "Modified" mags still work in glocks, so i'd say that is a non issue.

      Here was what they showed the public in the beginning. image.jpg
      NRA Lifetime Member

      Comment

      • #18
        SmallShark
        Senior Member
        • May 2011
        • 1395

        featureless or pre-2000 raw only

        Comment

        • #19
          dozer wright
          Veteran Member
          • Mar 2012
          • 2764

          Originally posted by Devilmonkey89
          Torkmag adapter is a better more economical route to take.
          I could see more economical. But the Tork mag looks to be a Couple pieces that need to be reset in the Mag well. And glock mags modified . As this is one piece and would drop in and out quickly . Could be wrong .

          Comment

          • #20
            sigstroker
            I need a LIFE!!
            • Jan 2009
            • 19136

            Plastic should be fine for mag blocks. It's not a high stress area.

            Comment

            • #21
              spfabrication
              Senior Member
              • Aug 2015
              • 1045

              Originally posted by sigstroker
              Plastic should be fine for mag blocks. It's not a high stress area.
              The feedramp is plastic and the ejector is permanently embedded in plastic.
              GO NAVY

              Comment

              • #22
                Devilmonkey89
                Senior Member
                • Sep 2013
                • 1539

                Originally posted by spfabrication
                The feedramp is plastic and the ejector is permanently embedded in plastic.
                Isn't the Glock ejector embedded in plastic?
                NRA Lifetime Member

                Comment

                • #23
                  Devilmonkey89
                  Senior Member
                  • Sep 2013
                  • 1539

                  Originally posted by dozer wright
                  I could see more economical. But the Tork mag looks to be a Couple pieces that need to be reset in the Mag well. And glock mags modified . As this is one piece and would drop in and out quickly . Could be wrong .
                  I agree, for the price difference though, one might opt for the cheaper one, comes down to ones personal preference.
                  NRA Lifetime Member

                  Comment

                  • #24
                    spfabrication
                    Senior Member
                    • Aug 2015
                    • 1045

                    Originally posted by Devilmonkey89
                    Isn't the Glock ejector embedded in plastic?
                    The glock ejector is removable and serviceable, not permanently attached.
                    GO NAVY

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    UA-8071174-1