Beretta CX4 9MM considered "Featureless"?

[Bulletz]

I have a Beretta CX4 9MM I want to sell, and I'm wonder if it could be considered "Featureless"?

The rifle looks like the following: https://imgur.com/gallery/NzXN4

[DNA]

Fill in the stock area behind the pistol grip and it would be considered featureless.

Dan

[BRANCHER]

Solar tactical sells a wrap. I have one on mine.

[Bulletz]

Hey BRANCHER, do you have a pic of it attached?

[DrewTheBrave]

Hey BRANCHER, do you have a pic of it attached?

Pretty simple to find:

http://bfy.tw/EFAW

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

[Go Navy]

This case perfectly illustrates the absurdity of Taxifornia gun laws. I own a Beretta CX4 Storm. I really like it. I hate the idea of bastardizing it, so I guess I'll register it, when or if anyone can figure out when that is required. Maybe I'll get lucky and some sensible court will nullify that set of rules.

[Go Navy]

Update: ordered the Sierra Papa hammer/trigger/spring kit upgrade; I sent my complete trigger assembly to Sierra Papa so they did the modifications. Received and installed the improved assembly myself with a bit of fiddling just due to doing one step out of sequence. I haven't fired it yet, but it sure feels better. $176 plus $10 shipping to N. Calif. The vendor is in Portland, Oregon.

Have ordered a Solar Tactical grip wrap, as of yesterday. Both upgrades were based on good advice in this forum.