Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Machining a featureless stock - Opinions?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • TerraHawk
    Junior Member
    • Oct 2013
    • 26

    Machining a featureless stock - Opinions?

    Hey Guys,

    I am making billet machined aluminum featureless stocks for myself and a few of my friends and I thought I would ask for opinions on the design. I saw one that was plastic and although it is probably fine, the engineer in me shudders at repetitive impact force on plastic. Especially since it is held on with a single 1/4-28 cap screw. Since I am starting with a block of material, adding features just adds a little weight.

    It is pretty easy to change the overall length based on the distances I measure from my wife's and friend's preferred position on their adjustable stocks.

    The shoulder piece is machined delrin with a sorbothane insert for shock.

    So, any suggestions? Thanks in advance.

    Todd
    Attached Files
  • #2
    Marauder2003
    Waiting for Abs
    CGN Contributor - Lifetime
    • Aug 2010
    • 2921

    I think as soon as you connect the buffer tube to the stock you have created a thumbhole stock. Even if you can put your whole hand in the hole.
    #NotMyPresident
    #ArrestFauci
    sigpic

    Comment

    • #3
      jeffyhog
      Veteran Member
      • Nov 2010
      • 2758

      Agreed, I think that would be considered a thumbhole stock.

      Comment

      • #4
        MechaDad
        Member
        • Aug 2014
        • 259

        But a very innovative thumbhole

        Comment

        • #5
          AreWeFree
          Veteran Member
          • Jan 2013
          • 4558

          Very cool, but not featureless and completely impractical.

          Comment

          • #6
            Exile Machine
            No longer in Business
            CGN Contributor - Lifetime
            • Oct 2009
            • 9551

            Not qualified to be offering legal opinion, but that particular topology is what is known in the field of higher mathematics as a "thumbhole stock."

            Regarding the impact force on plastic causing you to cringe, polymer gunstocks are typically made from glass filled nylon. That's one of the strongest engineered materials available, and more than strong enough to handle the force of recoil, especially when you consider that the force of recoil is countered by the the shooter's shoulder. There is no part of the human shoulder which is strong enough to bust a thick chunk of glass filled nylon.
            Manufacturer of CA AWB Compliance Products from Oct 2009 to Nov 2018

            Comment

            • #7
              SkyHawk
              I need a LIFE!!
              • Sep 2012
              • 23490

              Thumbhole. And plenty of Military issue M4s hold up just fine with 'plastic' stocks.
              Click here for my iTrader Feedback thread: https://www.calguns.net/forum/market...r-feedback-100

              Comment

              • #8
                sloppy joe
                Senior Member
                • Aug 2006
                • 776

                Looks like a thumbhole stock to me.

                Comment

                • #9
                  Ryridesmotox
                  Member
                  • Jan 2016
                  • 239

                  Suggestion,

                  The whole portion that connects to the buffer at the end can go away. the Aluminum will be strong enough with just the bottom structure (grip to pad) without needing to attach to the buffer... Also, that looks like a pretty long length of pull, even for me. What buffer length are you thinking? Because an A2 rifle buffer tube with that much space behind it would need some long arms to be comfortable

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    luckyduck
                    Senior Member
                    • Aug 2012
                    • 856

                    Would be helpful to get a legal opinion. From what I've understood is that the thumbhole stock is also held to the pistol grip definition in terms of positioning of the hand.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      spoof145
                      Member
                      • Dec 2013
                      • 352

                      Just get rid of the part that connects to the buffer tube. AND THEN send me one please, and thank you! It looks nifty. Standard A1 stock length of pull works for me.
                      How did you lose your hands?
                      I was a puppeteer, doing a show as 2 dogs. The ATF shot them.
                      -Some guy on the internet.

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        TerraHawk
                        Junior Member
                        • Oct 2013
                        • 26

                        Thank you all very much.
                        "Thumbhole stock" is out.

                        Length of buffer tube is 7.35" from back of Lower as measured by my buffer tube. Distance to back of stock is 11.31" from back of Lower as measured from my adjustable stock at max extension (where I shoot).

                        Would a cheek rest attachment be desirable?

                        Originally posted by Ryridesmotox
                        Suggestion,

                        The whole portion that connects to the buffer at the end can go away. the Aluminum will be strong enough with just the bottom structure (grip to pad) without needing to attach to the buffer... Also, that looks like a pretty long length of pull, even for me. What buffer length are you thinking? Because an A2 rifle buffer tube with that much space behind it would need some long arms to be comfortable
                        Attached Files

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          TerraHawk
                          Junior Member
                          • Oct 2013
                          • 26

                          Just to clarify, I am not against plastic! All of my collapsible stocks are made of plastic and they are fantastic. The issue is that my plastic stocks are mostly loaded in axial compression with relatively even stress distribution. Attaching the stock off the center of impulse guarantees bending moments. The interface available for attaching the stock is 60 degrees from horizontal and has only a single screw. Over time, I think there is the potential for issues to arise.

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            Ryridesmotox
                            Member
                            • Jan 2016
                            • 239

                            I was referring to the whole top half of the parallelogram there... You could probably just take that whole portion out.

                            Or the bottom portion. If you could remove the bottom portion that would probably be even more desirable for a precision competition shooter. That way you could get a good positive hold with a support hand to press the stock into a shoulder. maybe even have a small removable attachment for a monopod or pic rail.
                            Last edited by Ryridesmotox; 12-26-2016, 6:57 PM.

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              Ryridesmotox
                              Member
                              • Jan 2016
                              • 239

                              Forgive my horrific 'paint' skills

                              It would also remove half of the weight. Aluminum should be able to handle that no problem
                              Attached Files

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1