Extended slant brake

[onelonehorseman]

So, looking to next year . . . . .

I have a Yugo underfolder (M70AB2 kit on Nodak) that I plan to register, for a couple of reasons, including that I might be able to unlock the folding stock.

The problem, as I'm sure many of you are aware, is that with the original slant brake, and stock folded, it will only be 25-3/4" OAL; 1/4" shy of legal minimum for a CA AW.

I want to change the muzzle device to get it to a minimum OAL folded length of 26", but without changing the original look more than necessary.

Is there any place to get, or anyone who makes, a replacement slant brake that is 1/4" longer than standard?

I have searched around on-line and have zero luck so far.

Please, let's not get into a discussion of registering or not . . . .that's not the topic here

[God Bless America]

I have never heard of one.

Could take a longer AK brake, turn down, cut at a slant, and perkerize.

[Vicious_138]

Like this one?

http://www.cncwarrior.com/M14x1-LH-Extended-Length-Slant-Brake-p/22251.htm

[BLK RFL DIV]

Has the final language come out yet, can the bullet buttons be removed once registered?

If it's "as is" like the 2000 reg then I don't know why there's this assumption BB can be removed. Then again, I have no idea what CA DOJ will rule. Just a waiting game as I see it now.

[onelonehorseman]

Like this one?
http://www.cncwarrior.com/M14x1-LH-E...ke-p/22251.htm

That might do it! It says length is 1.5". I think the original brake is about 1.3" so it'll be close. I'll measure when I get home to see if that'll make it.

Thanks Vicious.

[onelonehorseman]

Has the final language come out yet, can the bullet buttons be removed once registered?

If it's "as is" like the 2000 reg then I don't know why there's this assumption BB can be removed. Then again, I have no idea what CA DOJ will rule. Just a waiting game as I see it now.

I will be surprised to see the final language publish before the beginning of next year.

[BLK RFL DIV]

I will be surprised to see the final language publish before the beginning of next year.

You and me both. I'm sure it'll have ambiguous clarity, too.