Whats the difference between the aimpoint pro vs aco? anything other than battery life?
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Difference between aimpoint Pro vs ACO
Collapse
X
-
Difference between aimpoint Pro vs ACO
Tags: None -
The OutdoorHub review of the Aimpoint ACO Red Dot Sight which is fully waterproof, and has an estimated battery life of 10,000 hours.
- The ACO has an estimated battery life of 10,000 hours (a little over a year) while the PRO has an estimated battery life of 30,000 hours (over three years) on brightness setting 7 out of 10 at room temperature.
- The ACO is not night-vision-compatible, while the PRO is.
- The ACO comes with a minimalist Picatinny mount that is not adjustable for height. The PRO’s QRP2 Picatinny mount is quite larger, is capable of using risers, and features a large tightening knob. Though it is not height-adjustable, the ACO’s mount is designed to provide absolute cowitness with standard AR-15 iron sights (using the supplied riser, the PRO should also offer the same cowitness).
- The ACO is fully waterproof, while the PRO is submersible to 45 meters.
- The ACO does not include flip-up lens covers, while the PRO does.
- The ACO retails for about $390 online, while the PRO lists for approximately $435. The latter can be had for even less on sale, while I have yet to see the ACO on sale.Originally posted by G. Michael HopfHard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men, and weak men create hard times. -
Also, I believe the ACO has a smaller footprint and weighs less.Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,865,733
Posts: 25,134,373
Members: 355,945
Active Members: 3,902
Welcome to our newest member, glocksource.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 4638 users online. 79 members and 4559 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 10:39 PM on 02-14-2026.

Comment