Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Is AK Buffer really neccesary?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Neil McCauley
    I need a LIFE!!
    • Jun 2006
    • 13676

    Is AK Buffer really neccesary?

    I've shot about 200 rnds through my AK and I'm wondering if its worth spending 10 -15 bucks on a recoil buffer. I have no experience with these things and they sound like a good idea in theory. The manufacture claims it'll prolong the life of the rifle by stopping the bolt from slamming the receiver. Would an AK really destroy itself like that?

    My AK does kick a little bit, I figure its just normal, what do you guys think?
    A guy told me one time "don't let yourself get attached to anything you are not willing to walk out on in 30 seconds flat if you feel the heat from around the corner"
    Robert Deniro
  • #2
    bwiese
    I need a LIFE!!
    • Oct 2005
    • 27622

    My 'smith (Rich Saunders at CGW) told me to not put one on the FAL refinish/rebuild he did for me. Said 'extras' like this not part of orig design largely cause more problems than they solve.

    I'd figure an AK is the same way.

    Bill Wiese
    San Jose, CA

    CGF Board Member / NRA Benefactor Life Member / CRPA life member
    sigpic
    No postings of mine here, unless otherwise specifically noted, are
    to be construed as formal or informal positions of the Calguns.Net
    ownership, The Calguns Foundation, Inc. ("CGF"), the NRA, or my
    employer. No posts of mine on Calguns are to be construed as
    legal advice, which can only be given by a lawyer.

    Comment

    • #3
      dwtt
      Calguns Addict
      • Oct 2005
      • 7470

      The Buffer Tech stuff are mostly useless. There is no need to put one in you AK. I never had one of these recoil buffers in my Chinese AK when I owned it and never had any problems. There are millions of AK's out there in the world shooting fine without one of these buffers installed.

      Comment

      • #4
        Neil McCauley
        I need a LIFE!!
        • Jun 2006
        • 13676

        Thanks you guys, seriously this question has been eating me for months. Just saved me 15 bucks and a trip to the gun show. ^5
        A guy told me one time "don't let yourself get attached to anything you are not willing to walk out on in 30 seconds flat if you feel the heat from around the corner"
        Robert Deniro

        Comment

        • #5
          grammaton76
          Administrator
          CGN Contributor - Lifetime
          • Dec 2005
          • 9511

          The only time I've read that those buffers are really important, is if you have too much gap on the rear rails and your bolt carrier likes to try and jump out at the rear stroke of your action's cycle. In those cases, the buffer is the only way you're going to have a usable rifle, short of some fairly involved metal work.
          Primary author of gunwiki.net - 'like' it on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Gunwiki/242578512591 to see whenever new content gets added!

          Comment

          • #6
            onley11
            Member
            • Jan 2006
            • 224

            The buffers are good in custom guns that need them as a standard part to keep the gun from beating itself to death. I have a custom mini and a custom 2011 (sti) 40 cal that are both so tight that it makes a difference. But a stockish properly designed gun doesn't need it. If it did, they would have specified for it(ar -15 comes to mind)

            Comment

            • #7
              NwG
              Member
              • Nov 2005
              • 321

              Antything that stops the action from a full cycle can't be a good thing.....
              1911.....

              Comment

              • #8
                juha_teuvonnen
                Member
                • Jan 2006
                • 179

                The recoil buffer is useless. AK is world's most popular military rifle, yet I don't know a single manufacturer who would equip an AK with a buffer. Mikhail Timofeevich came up with a very good design, and I am yet to see a significant and worthy improvement to it.

                Comment

                • #9
                  JPglee1
                  Veteran Member
                  • Jan 2006
                  • 3025


                  The bolt carrier doesn't really slam into the trunnion that much, occasionally but it seems like the ammo isn't real consistent in it's charge. (see video above)

                  The only thing I would use one for is to keep the carrier from jumping out of the rails if your take down slots are too big (out of spec)

                  Otherwise, let it beat itself to death

                  JP

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    dwtt
                    Calguns Addict
                    • Oct 2005
                    • 7470

                    Originally posted by juha_teuvonnen
                    Mikhail Timofeevich came up with a very good design, and I am yet to see a significant and worthy improvement to it.
                    Timofeevich? Is that Kalashnikov in Russian?

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      Ironballs
                      Member
                      • Oct 2005
                      • 488

                      on a ruger 10/22 its nice as it cuts noise...
                      most other applications are nonesense... glock and ak especially...
                      PRK -----> Henderson - Las Vegas area.
                      Not a single regret!

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        juha_teuvonnen
                        Member
                        • Jan 2006
                        • 179

                        Originally posted by dwtt
                        Timofeevich? Is that Kalashnikov in Russian?
                        That's Mr. Kalashnikov's patronymic. In Russian, when you address somebody with respect, typically someone older than you or somebody who is your boss, you add patronymic after the first name. A patronymic is the person's father's name with 'vich' or 'evich' added at the end.

                        In Russian it's "Михаил Тимофеевич Калашников" (Mikhail Timofeevich Kalashnikov).

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        UA-8071174-1