difference between Stag, cmmg, and Noveske lowers?

[mlin]

Earlier this year, John Noveske gave an interview to Defense Review and here was some of his word:

"The lowers on our rifles are made by CMT... We had some made by LAR..... with a B prefix on the serial number, but that was a limited production run....."

You can see the interview in:

http://www.defensereview.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1167

[LIFEWITHOUT]

Alower is a lower. Spend your heavier coins on the upper and trigger and glass.

[CRTguns]

Do people really beleive there is a difference.. like an actual difference besides the name?

We don't poll our friends about the best bottled water out there, right?
One water is not "better" than the next, right?
How about milk.. is fosters better than crystal?
Gas... well, chevron has techron, so yeah, it's better.
AR's dont use techron though.

Truth is, there are @ 7 MFG of AR recievers in this country, and they ALL use aluminum, they ALL use either a forging or a milled billet, and they ALL use the same go-no go guage to QC the things when they are done.

Lets not get started on the 1911 pistols... SIG, KIMBER and S&W- yes, they all share the same birth mother too.

Not one brand is "better" than the other. They are different, sure- but quality, accuracy, reliability and such are moot.

when you get more diverse... like bolt action rifles, yes there is a clear winner in the hunting class. And a winner in varminter class, and a winner in target class, etc... but the business of EBRs has only one highlight, and that is that they ALL are EBRs. nuff said.

To make or break your build, consider optics, trigger, BARREL brand.
The furniture does NOT make your gun more accurate.
The paint does not make it tactical.
The poundage of stuff on your RIS does not make the rifle better.
These do make it COOLER.

...all in kindness and respect. I just gotta say it.