Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Pre-64

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Timbo14
    Junior Member
    • Oct 2013
    • 13

    Pre-64

    Just a question for the database:

    How common were the factory 26" SS barrels with the black oxide coating?

    I have a 1960 .264 with one and was curious if this was the norm on the std rifle?
  • #2
    Fjold
    I need a LIFE!!
    • Oct 2005
    • 22904

    It was normal for the 264 Win magnum. I don't think that it was offered in any other chambering.
    Frank

    One rifle, one planet, Holland's 375




    Life Member NRA, CRPA and SAF

    Comment

    • #3
      toby
      Banned
      • Jan 2010
      • 10576

      They were a rarity not many made.

      Comment

      • #4
        buffybuster
        Veteran Member
        • Oct 2005
        • 2615

        Original 1962 Remington M700's in 7mm Remington Magnum also had blacken stainless steel barrels. The stainless was believe to resist throat erosion better than cro-moly and they were blacken at great expense (multi-set plating process) as marketing thought buyers would not accept the bare stainless.
        Luck favors the prepared.

        The original battle plan did not survive initial contact with the enemy.

        "The things that will destroy America are prosperity at any price, peace at any price, safety first instead of duty first, the love of soft living and the get rich quick theory of life." -Theodore Roosevelt

        Comment

        • #5
          Wrangler John
          Senior Member
          • Oct 2009
          • 1799

          I also had one in .264 Magnum, the muzzle was not blackened but left white. In the original ammunition Winchester also used a double diameter bullet in the .264 Magnum. The 140 grain bullet just ahead of the cannelure was bore diameter (around .256" IIRC), I surmised so it could fit the short throat of the chamber by riding the lands, I don't recall why they did this, maybe as a pseudo freebore to control pressure, or due to magazine limitations, but I did verify this by measurement.

          The .264 Magnum and that rifle were the most accurate combination out of the box I had purchased up to that time.

          Comment

          • #6
            Noonanda
            Veteran Member
            • Oct 2005
            • 3404

            What is the difference between a pre-64 and a post 64 model 70? I know that the pre 64's are more valuable and or desired but I don't know why that is.
            "You see in this world theres two kinds of people my friend. Those with loaded guns, and those who dig... You Dig" Blondie from TGBU

            Comment

            • #7
              Fjold
              I need a LIFE!!
              • Oct 2005
              • 22904

              Originally posted by Noonanda
              What is the difference between a pre-64 and a post 64 model 70? I know that the pre 64's are more valuable and or desired but I don't know why that is.
              In 1964 Winchester changed the Model 70 from a controlled round feed action to a pushfeed action. They stopped hand fitting the metal parts, changed numerous small parts from metal to plastic, changed the stock from cut checkering to impressed checkering and did a bunch of other cost cutting things to make the price more competitive with other brand production rifles.

              Later they reintroduced many of the original features in the "Classic" model 70s after their sales tanked on the post 64 model 70s.
              Frank

              One rifle, one planet, Holland's 375




              Life Member NRA, CRPA and SAF

              Comment

              • #8
                GM4spd
                Calguns Addict
                • May 2008
                • 5682

                Originally posted by Fjold
                It was normal for the 264 Win magnum. I don't think that it was offered in any other chambering.
                220 Swifts were also done this way,Pete

                Last edited by GM4spd; 10-08-2014, 5:36 PM.

                Comment

                • #9
                  kendog4570
                  Calguns Addict
                  • Dec 2008
                  • 5180

                  Originally posted by Fjold
                  In 1964 Winchester changed the Model 70 from a controlled round feed action to a pushfeed action. They stopped hand fitting the metal parts, changed numerous small parts from metal to plastic, changed the stock from cut checkering to impressed checkering and did a bunch of other cost cutting things to make the price more competitive with other brand production rifles.

                  Later they reintroduced many of the original features in the "Classic" model 70s after their sales tanked on the post 64 model 70s.

                  A little blasphemy here, but the post '72 push feeds are every bit as smooth and silky as the pre 64 guns, and in many ways a better action. Chuck a few in a truing fixture and run a dial indicator over them and you will see a marked tightening of tolerances in the push feeds over the Pre 64 guns. No need to hand fit something that comes out of the fixture ready to go.
                  A little more blasphemy, right before the Clinton gun bans, Norinco produced a M70 Controlled round clone, and it was tighter and truer than any Winchester.
                  I'll duck now....

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    toby
                    Banned
                    • Jan 2010
                    • 10576

                    Originally posted by kendog4570
                    A little blasphemy here, but the post '72 push feeds are every bit as smooth and silky as the pre 64 guns, and in many ways a better action. Chuck a few in a truing fixture and run a dial indicator over them and you will see a marked tightening of tolerances in the push feeds over the Pre 64 guns. No need to hand fit something that comes out of the fixture ready to go.
                    A little more blasphemy, right before the Clinton gun bans, Norinco produced a M70 Controlled round clone, and it was tighter and truer than any Winchester.
                    I'll duck now....
                    All said neither of which will ever hold a candle to the true Rifleman's Rifle the one and only PRE 1964 Winchester model 70.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      Fjold
                      I need a LIFE!!
                      • Oct 2005
                      • 22904

                      Originally posted by kendog4570
                      A little blasphemy here, but the post '72 push feeds are every bit as smooth and silky as the pre 64 guns, and in many ways a better action. Chuck a few in a truing fixture and run a dial indicator over them and you will see a marked tightening of tolerances in the push feeds over the Pre 64 guns. No need to hand fit something that comes out of the fixture ready to go.
                      A little more blasphemy, right before the Clinton gun bans, Norinco produced a M70 Controlled round clone, and it was tighter and truer than any Winchester.
                      I'll duck now....
                      I have pushfeed and CRF rifles so I'm not prejudiced but I prefer CRF in my big game hunting guns. I actually have never wanted a pre-64 Model 70 as I believe that the "Classic" CRF action is better with the anti-bind bolt. Also, Winchester never made the pre-64 in a left handed version.

                      The post 64's never looked as good as the pre-64 models and most people buy rifles based on looks.
                      Frank

                      One rifle, one planet, Holland's 375




                      Life Member NRA, CRPA and SAF

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        kendog4570
                        Calguns Addict
                        • Dec 2008
                        • 5180

                        Originally posted by toby
                        All said neither of which will ever hold a candle to the true Rifleman's Rifle the one and only PRE 1964 Winchester model 70.

                        Maybe David Tubb and many others never got that memo. Plenty wins and National titles with the ol' push feed.

                        Jack O'Connor was a great scribe. Typical of a lot of "gun writers", past and present. I don't think he spent much time on the firing line. I listen to the likes of Mike Venturino and Jim Carmichael. They are not afraid to compete with us mere mortals and let the results speak for themselves. There are a few others, but not too many.
                        I'll duck some more....

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          toby
                          Banned
                          • Jan 2010
                          • 10576

                          Originally posted by kendog4570
                          Maybe David Tubb and many others never got that memo. Plenty wins and National titles with the ol' push feed.

                          Jack O'Connor was a great scribe. Typical of a lot of "gun writers", past and present. I don't think he spent much time on the firing line. I listen to the likes of Mike Venturino and Jim Carmichael. They are not afraid to compete with us mere mortals and let the results speak for themselves. There are a few others, but not too many.
                          I'll duck some more....
                          So it's now about competition rifles, OK! I'm speaking of rifles in general and except for the Quote I never said anything about O'Conner, and the David Tubb reply, Whatever! Mike and Jim are great gunners I've followed them from the beginning's well almost. We all have opinions. You can keep yours.

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            TMB 1
                            Calguns Addict
                            • Dec 2012
                            • 7153

                            I thought the Rifleman's rifle was a model 92 Winchester
                            sigpic

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              Dutch Henry
                              Senior Member
                              • Feb 2012
                              • 733

                              I read somewhere that in the years prior to WWII Winchester used stainless steel barrels on M70 rifles chambered in .220 Swift. The idea being that barrel life could be increased.

                              Shooters of the day seemed to be turned off by the idea of a rifle with a shiny barrel, so Winchester plated the barrels with iron, after which the barrel went through the normal bluing process.

                              I'm not sure if process was or wasn't changed for later manufactured rifles. Only working from memory here.
                              Last edited by Dutch Henry; 10-09-2014, 1:00 PM.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1