Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

.280 or .270: close decision

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #31
    Mark B
    Junior Member
    • Nov 2009
    • 71

    And there you have it. Looks like sound reasoning to me thanks.

    Comment

    • #32
      ElvenSoul
      I need a LIFE!!
      • Apr 2008
      • 17431

      Op check out Remington 700 LSS Mountain Rifle in .280Rem.
      sigpic

      Comment

      • #33
        advocatusdiaboli
        Calguns Addict
        • Sep 2009
        • 5521

        I will. I kind of liked the Remy 7600 pump but they are way too expensive at over $1,000 in 7mm-08 (for a mountain rifle). I thought they made them in .280 but they don't seem to be available.
        Benefactor Life Member NRA, Life Member CRPA, CGN Contributor, US Army Veteran, Black Ribbon in Memoriam for the deceased 2nd Amendment
        sigpic

        Comment

        • #34
          duckman1
          CGN/CGSSA Contributor
          CGN Contributor
          • Aug 2009
          • 3737

          .270 for all of the reasons you outlined in your original statement plus the fact you can find it on a shelf in just about any sporting goods store or hunting camp.


          Think about forgetting your ammo or having your ammo separated from you during travel.

          Comment

          • #35
            advocatusdiaboli
            Calguns Addict
            • Sep 2009
            • 5521

            Originally posted by duckman1
            .270 for all of the reasons you outlined in your original statement plus the fact you can find it on a shelf in just about any sporting goods store or hunting camp.


            Think about forgetting your ammo or having your ammo separated from you during travel.
            That is a valid concern with air travel these days. The .270 is a venerable all-around cartridge and I couldn't go wrong with it. At all. .270, .280, 7mm-08...all possibilities.

            One could mitigate the lost ammo risk by shipping some ammo to their destination lodge or guide ahead of time. Cost is minimal and the peace of mind...precious.
            Benefactor Life Member NRA, Life Member CRPA, CGN Contributor, US Army Veteran, Black Ribbon in Memoriam for the deceased 2nd Amendment
            sigpic

            Comment

            • #36
              toby
              Banned
              • Jan 2010
              • 10576

              If I had to rely on ammo sources from forgetting my ammo on a hunt I would be doubly screwed because I don't shoot factory ammo and most of the calibers I shoot are wildcats. 43 years and never had an issue loosing or forgetting my ammo.

              Comment

              • #37
                russ69
                Calguns Addict
                • Nov 2009
                • 9348

                Originally posted by rm1911
                Both rounds are based on the '06 case. So why not just go with original. You can't really improve upon perfection
                I'm in the same place. Elk will want a big 30 cal bullet.
                sigpic

                Comment

                • #38
                  264winchester
                  Junior Member
                  • Feb 2013
                  • 7

                  Ballisticly the 280 is heads above the 270.......................

                  UHHH Correction:
                  The .284 bullet selection is heads above the .277 bullet selection.

                  For .277
                  Berger is wayyyy overdue on the 170 gr EOL, Matrix has 165 and 175 gr, Nosler has 150 gr ALR, Sierra has 135 gr, Woodleigh has 180 gr weldcore protected point. So you see not much selection compared to the .284 and the .308 is king of selection.

                  Comment

                  • #39
                    264winchester
                    Junior Member
                    • Feb 2013
                    • 7

                    Originally posted by russ69
                    I'm in the same place. Elk will want a big 30 cal bullet.
                    Try telling that to Scandinavians who use the .264 diameter on moose.

                    Comment

                    • #40
                      mark501w
                      Senior Member
                      • Apr 2011
                      • 1699

                      .270 is a good cartridge so is .280 when everybody is buying up everything even though they can't use it I saw .270 on the shelves.

                      Comment

                      • #41
                        264winchester
                        Junior Member
                        • Feb 2013
                        • 7

                        Originally posted by Coyotegunner
                        I have owned rifles a few times in 270 and usually traded them or sold them.
                        I just prefer the 280 and the 7mm-08.I reload for both.
                        Reasons:Mild recoil,easy on brass,enough energy at hunting ranges to kill anything in the lower 48.
                        Last edited by 264winchester; 02-06-2014, 7:28 PM.

                        Comment

                        • #42
                          264winchester
                          Junior Member
                          • Feb 2013
                          • 7

                          Originally posted by rm1911
                          Both rounds are based on the '06 case. So why not just go with original. You can't really improve upon perfection


                          CORRECTION: Both rounds are based on the 30-03 case.

                          Comment

                          • #43
                            toby
                            Banned
                            • Jan 2010
                            • 10576

                            Did you buy a damn rifle yet?

                            Comment

                            • #44
                              264winchester
                              Junior Member
                              • Feb 2013
                              • 7

                              Originally posted by pennstater
                              ^^^This wins!^^^
                              Both rounds are based on the 30-03 case.

                              You lose!

                              Comment

                              • #45
                                Model94Guy
                                Senior Member
                                • Jan 2012
                                • 669

                                The 1903 was never produced in 30-03, the cal. change was made during prototype testing. The 03 fired a 220 grn. round nose bullet and was a shorter cartridge, testing showed it was not nearly as accurate the 160 grn. "pointy" bullet. So what this means is you and i both know some meaningless B.S.. LOL

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1