Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

8.6 Blackout

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #16
    LynnJr
    Calguns Addict
    • Jan 2013
    • 7944

    There is no difference between a 300 Whisperand a 300 Blackout that I am aware of and I have both.
    Hopefully the 338 Blackout is something new. Anybody have any case dimensions?
    Last edited by LynnJr; 11-04-2021, 3:19 PM.
    Lynn Dragoman, Jr.
    Southwest Regional Director
    Unlimited Range Shooters Association (URSA)
    www.unlimitedrange.org
    Not a commercial business.
    URSA - Competition starts at 2000 yards!

    Comment

    • #17
      BillyMays
      Member
      • May 2019
      • 330

      Originally posted by LynnJr
      I think I only mentioned the bullets rpm which doesn't take mass into question? Or where you referencing centripetal force which does? I like to use like units to keep perspective.
      My point was exactly that RPM doesn't take mass into question. I was pointing out that a heavier bullet with equal RPM would have more angular momentum- like centripetal force but not exactly the same, however I believe we are referring to the same idea.

      Comment

      • #18
        ar15barrels
        I need a LIFE!!
        • Jan 2006
        • 56842

        Originally posted by LynnJr
        There is no difference between a 300 Whisper and a 300 Blackout that I am aware of and I have both.
        Depending on whose reamer, there is 0.050" of case trim length variation (case length) among 300 whisper, 300x221, 30x221, 30 fireball, 300 fireball, 300 AAC and 300 blackout.
        Randall Rausch

        AR work: www.ar15barrels.com
        Bolt actions: www.700barrels.com
        Foreign Semi Autos: www.akbarrels.com
        Barrel, sight and trigger work on most pistols and shotguns.
        Most work performed while-you-wait.

        Comment

        • #19
          SharedShots
          Senior Member
          • Feb 2021
          • 2277

          Originally posted by BillyMays
          This is assuming the mass of the projectiles is the same. If two projectiles of equal mass hit an object, but one is traveling 3000fps and one is traveling 1000fps, you would expect the faster projectile to penetrate deeper because it has higher kinetic energy.

          Projectile weight isn't and has never been the most important determining factor for penetration. Velocity hasn't been it either.


          Now consider two projectiles with equal penetration (and shape) but different speeds- the slower projectile must be heavier to penetrate the same distance. This heavier projectile would have more angular momentum than a similar sized lighter projectile at equal RPM, so it would transfer more rotational energy. My thought is that because the bullet has higher angular momentum and low entry speed, when it hits a target it more quickly begins to tumble? I have no idea if this is true. It also doesn't take into account bullet shape or stability, which I think could have a much greater effect- as seen in .223 wounds.

          Anyways just my ramblings... I'm sure I've missed something so please correct me
          Some of what you said might apply if the projectiles remain in their original shape but then it's usually limited to very heavily constructed projectiles.

          At some point, velocity can and does limit penetration because the projectile deforms to a greater degree than the lower velocity one and thus penetrates less.

          It is also true that liquids ( blood much like water) resists the travel of foreign objects through it. You can see this yourself with a simple test in a pool. Walking through thigh high water isn't much of a problem, then try to run. Taken to extremes as you'd find with fired bullets the faster the bullet the greater the resistance to the point where the bullet could fragment at the surface while the slower bullet passes through the surface several inches.

          I see the rotation energy as more marketing type ideas than reality. The reduction in speed is so great over such a short period of time only with a projectile that deforms would there be much benefit. If the projectile is so heavily constructed that at much higher velocities still doesn't deform then the rotational speed wouldn't matter very much. If however the bullet deforms then rotational speed could be an important factor but then it comes full circle, the deforming bullet tends to penetrate less even when it has greater mass and velocity and this is proven in many tests.

          So then, two bullets traveling at different velocities where the bullet deforms could see the slower velocity bullet penetrate deeper than the one with higher velocity. In that case the lower velocity bullet could create much greater damage since it penetrated into vital areas whereas the higher velocity bullet creates a larger but shallower wound.

          The difference could be very apparent if one were going after that Cape Buffalo.

          This is why you never hunt Cafe Buffalo without your trained twin bother male lions on breakway leashes.
          Let Go of the Status Quo!

          Don't worry, it will never pass...How in the hell did that pass?

          Think past your gun, it's the last resort, the first is your brain.

          Defense is a losing proposition when time is on the side of the opponent. In the history of humanity, no defense has ever won against an enemy with time on their side.

          Comment

          • #20
            sigstroker
            I need a LIFE!!
            • Jan 2009
            • 18997

            They are definitely working on expanding bullets.



            We had the good fortune to catch up with David Stark from Discreet Ballistics to pick his brain on the new 8.6 Creedmoor cartridge and get a wealth of information.


            Because of the fast twist rates destroying traditional bullets, they seem to be concentrating on all copper ones.

            Comment

            Working...
            UA-8071174-1