OK, so school me on SAKO rifles. I've been wanting one for a long time, but get so confused with their whole naming system, AI, AII, AIII etc, and L49, L61, L61R. What are the main differences in these rifles? If I understand correctly, they are just different naming conventions for action lengths, correct?
I'm looking to get an older one because I like the beautiful wood and deep rich blueing of the older rifles. Is one generation/type better than or have any advantages over the other?
Also, not sure what caliber. I read a lot of good things about 6.5 Swede, but I already have a 6.5 CM. I'm looking at 7mm-08, but ballistically seems pretty close to .270, albeit from a shorter case, and I have one of those. I don't plan on hunting anything outside of the lower 48, so with the exception of maybe Grizzly and Brown bears, and maybe moose, I think .270 has everything pretty much covered.
Not really a fan of the magnums as I think they are overkill for anything in the lower 48, except for maybe moose and the bigger bears.
Let's get the conversation going.
I'm looking to get an older one because I like the beautiful wood and deep rich blueing of the older rifles. Is one generation/type better than or have any advantages over the other?
Also, not sure what caliber. I read a lot of good things about 6.5 Swede, but I already have a 6.5 CM. I'm looking at 7mm-08, but ballistically seems pretty close to .270, albeit from a shorter case, and I have one of those. I don't plan on hunting anything outside of the lower 48, so with the exception of maybe Grizzly and Brown bears, and maybe moose, I think .270 has everything pretty much covered.
Not really a fan of the magnums as I think they are overkill for anything in the lower 48, except for maybe moose and the bigger bears.
Let's get the conversation going.


Comment