Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

ATF possibly classifying ar bolt uppers as firearms

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #16
    rm1911
    Veteran Member
    • Jan 2013
    • 4073

    Originally posted by ar15barrels
    An AR upper absolutely can fire without the upper.
    All you have to do it smack the back of the firing pin.



    Using your logic, explain the FAL and the SCAR...
    Both have lower halves that contain the complete trigger/hammer mechanism.
    The upper halves only contains the barrel and bolt group, yet is considered to be the firearm.


    Which is why I prefaced it with

    NRA Life Member since 1990

    They're not liberals, they're leftists. Please don't use the former for the latter. Liberals are Locke, Jefferson, Burke, Hayek. Leftists are progressives, Prussian state-socialists, fascists. Liberals stand against the state and unequivocally support liberty. Leftists support state tyranny.

    Comment

    • #17
      sigstroker
      I need a LIFE!!
      • Jan 2009
      • 19612

      FAL, SCAR, Ruger .22 pistol, etc all have the upper as the serial numbered part FROM THE MANUFACTURER. No AR-15 that I've ever heard of have the upper as the serial numbered part. It's just a part, like a magazine.

      Comment

      • #18
        JTROKS
        I need a LIFE!!
        • Nov 2007
        • 13093

        And the CZ Scorpion Evo’s Serial # is located where?
        The wise man said just find your place
        In the eye of the storm
        Seek the roses along the way
        Just beware of the thorns...
        K. Meine

        Comment

        • #19
          MongooseV8
          Veteran Member
          • Apr 2010
          • 4426

          Originally posted by ar15barrels
          An AR upper absolutely can fire without the upper.
          All you have to do it smack the back of the firing pin.



          Using your logic, explain the FAL and the SCAR...
          Both have lower halves that contain the complete trigger/hammer mechanism.
          The upper halves only contains the barrel and bolt group, yet is considered to be the firearm.
          Using your logic a cartridge is a firearm. Or just a barrel is a firearm. All you have to do is smack the back of it.

          The current legal definition of a firearm receiver houses the hammer, bolt, or breechlock AND a firing mechanism. An AR lower receiver houses the both the hammer and firing mechanism and the upper does not.

          Comment

          • #20
            ar15barrels
            I need a LIFE!!
            • Jan 2006
            • 57103

            Originally posted by rm1911
            It makes no sense. Just like most gun laws.
            Truth.
            Randall Rausch

            AR work: www.ar15barrels.com
            Bolt actions: www.700barrels.com
            Foreign Semi Autos: www.akbarrels.com
            Barrel, sight and trigger work on most pistols and shotguns.
            Most work performed while-you-wait.

            Comment

            • #21
              ar15barrels
              I need a LIFE!!
              • Jan 2006
              • 57103

              Originally posted by sigstroker
              No AR-15 that I've ever heard of have the upper as the serial numbered part.
              Some of the very first AR-57 uppers were serialized and sold as a firearm.
              The early opinion on them was that because the upper held the barrel and the magazine that the ATF considered them firearms.
              There was a huge uproar over this, but it eventually got resolved as they are now sold as accessory upper halves with no markings or FFL requirements.
              Randall Rausch

              AR work: www.ar15barrels.com
              Bolt actions: www.700barrels.com
              Foreign Semi Autos: www.akbarrels.com
              Barrel, sight and trigger work on most pistols and shotguns.
              Most work performed while-you-wait.

              Comment

              • #22
                ar15barrels
                I need a LIFE!!
                • Jan 2006
                • 57103

                Originally posted by MongooseV8
                The current legal definition of a firearm receiver houses the hammer, bolt, or breechlock AND a firing mechanism.
                Yet that definition is not universally applied...
                Randall Rausch

                AR work: www.ar15barrels.com
                Bolt actions: www.700barrels.com
                Foreign Semi Autos: www.akbarrels.com
                Barrel, sight and trigger work on most pistols and shotguns.
                Most work performed while-you-wait.

                Comment

                • #23
                  k1dude
                  I need a LIFE!!
                  • May 2009
                  • 14628

                  So now my upper is a firearm and my lower is another firearm. Yet neither can be fired by themselves.

                  If I put them together am I shooting 2 guns at once?

                  Typical liberal illogic.
                  "Show me a young conservative and I'll show you a man without a heart. Show me an old liberal and I'll show you a man without a brain." - Sir Winston Churchill

                  "I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue!" - Senator Barry Goldwater

                  Comment

                  • #24
                    MongooseV8
                    Veteran Member
                    • Apr 2010
                    • 4426

                    No your upper is not a firearm. The ATF cannot make up new rules or define laws. This will need to be settled through the courts. Im sure they will side with the ATF but for now an upper is just parts.

                    Comment

                    • #25
                      bubbapug1
                      Calguns Addict
                      • Nov 2008
                      • 7958

                      If you think about it the ruling makes sense, especially for those with schizophrenia. Why NOT have one gun actually be two guns in one package so both your personality profiles can own one?

                      Dah!! Come on guys. Get a clue.
                      I love America for the rights and freedoms we used to have.

                      Comment

                      • #26
                        ELR Researcher
                        Senior Member
                        • Dec 2012
                        • 526

                        Originally posted by MongooseV8

                        The current legal definition of a firearm receiver houses the hammer, bolt, or breechlock AND a firing mechanism. An AR lower receiver houses the both the hammer and firing mechanism and the upper does not.
                        Please provide the CA code citation for:

                        1. "firearm receiver"
                        2. "firing mechanism"

                        The Safety Harbor uppers (bolt action "uppers") include a bolt and firing pin. However, as best I know, in the normal course of being used (i.e., not banging on the firing pin with something that is NOT part of the manufacturer-provided part), they cannot cause the discharge of a loaded cartridge. Is that correct or incorrect?

                        Thanks.
                        ELR Researcher, Benefactor Member NRA and Life Member CRPA
                        www.elr-resources.com
                        Not a commercial business.
                        ELR - anything shorter is point blank.

                        Unlimited Range Shooters Association (URSA), Webmaster and Marketing Assistant
                        www.unlimitedrange.org
                        Not a commercial business.
                        URSA - competition starts at 2000 yards!

                        Comment

                        • #27
                          MongooseV8
                          Veteran Member
                          • Apr 2010
                          • 4426

                          The regs are included in the op article. Some firearms do not follow the current definitions but that doesnt change the defintions.

                          Just like auto manufacturers dont always follow federal lighting regs sometimes.

                          Comment

                          • #28
                            MongooseV8
                            Veteran Member
                            • Apr 2010
                            • 4426

                            I also would like to point out that examples like the Ruger Mark I Standard were designed well before the 1968 definition was established, and the FN FAL was designed in another country then imported.

                            Comment

                            • #29
                              augoldminer
                              Junior Member
                              • Jun 2013
                              • 86

                              Under the upper being a firearm i can build unnumbered lowers for them without a mag well.
                              Bolt-together AR-15 lower receiver.


                              Or with a mag well and also build a few extra parts with holes for a autosear but with out finishing the threads on it so that its not complete and not yet usable.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1