Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thoughts on a light, mild game-getter on a budget.
Collapse
X
-
Thoughts on a light, mild game-getter on a budget.
Tags: None -
Not a bad setup but it wont be light weight. -
I’m good with anything around 8lbs. Are boyds stocks in the 2# range?
How about a lighter option?Comment
-
A boyds will probably put you in the 8-8.5# range without a scope. A heavy Vortex will be another 1#.Comment
-
-
My advice is either use the ruger as is and get a lighter scope like a Leupold, or better yet get a Tikka. With a fullsize scope mine weighs 7.5# loaded with a sling.Comment
-
7mm08 pricey for non lead ammo and hard to find in a hurry.Comment
-
I agree. Lighter is better, especially if you're not a teenager any more.
If you're going to replace the scope because it might not hold up, you want something in the 2-8 power range. 12X is more than you need for game.
My "game getter" is a .30-06 with a Leupold 2.5-8 power scope but if you're like me and prefer to get close, a .308 would also fit the bill, it wouldn't punish you quite so much, and ammunition is cheap and easy to find.
My $.02Comment
-
Why replace the stock? Especially for a field rifle.Comment
-
-
-
-
Sounds like a compromise rifle someone built and then figured out that compromises suck.
It's not heavy enough to be a good target gun, but way too heavy to be a good hunting gun.Randall Rausch
AR work: www.ar15barrels.com
Handguns: www.handgunbarrels.com
Bolt actions: www.700barrels.com
Foreign Semi Autos: www.akbarrels.com
Most work done while you wait on a scheduled shop visit.Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,867,882
Posts: 25,163,753
Members: 357,365
Active Members: 5,136
Welcome to our newest member, Kahiau18.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 27121 users online. 136 members and 26985 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 10:39 PM on 02-14-2026.

Comment