Tweet
Nikon seem to be very underrated scopes. I would look at them. They have been doing optics for a very long time. I have a one of their cheaper ($150) on my .17 and am very very impressed. Glass is better then my Vortex of tripple the price.
-
-
Nikons are a solid choice. Vortex also makes some mid level scopes that are a lot friendlier on the wallet. I own 1 vortex , and 1 nightforce. Everything else is leupold. I am a leupold fanboi through and through. Hard to beat their lifetime warranty no questions asked original owner or not. Not that you would need it. I just like the thought of knowing I'm only buying once!Last edited by Tac driver; 10-01-2017, 1:30 PM.Comment
-
is there a difference in the quality/clarity of the image between fixed and variable?
I will look into nikon, as well.Comment
-
-
but typically the fixed will be as good if not better same brand for cheaper.Last edited by Tac driver; 10-01-2017, 1:37 PM.Comment
-
I like this one but it seems like it designed for the .223.
Comment
-
Check out the leupold vx2 6-18x40 with the lrv reticle. It's basically same scope not designed for an AR. Cheaper too.Comment
-
Decide which focal plane you want to use and we can go from there.
I normally wouldn't ask but this is CalGuns.Lynn Dragoman, Jr.
Southwest Regional Director
Unlimited Range Shooters Association (URSA)
www.unlimitedrange.org
Not a commercial business.
URSA - Competition starts at 2000 yards!Comment
There are currently 18107 users online. 57 members and 18050 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 10:39 PM on 02-14-2026.
Comment