Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

10mm vs .45acp

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Maddawg46
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2012
    • 728

    10mm vs .45acp

    A friend of mine is planning on hunting out of state next year for Bear. He is not much of a handgun guy, but wants a semi-auto to carry while hunting. He was considering a .45acp. I told him that's not a very powerful round for Bear or other semi dangerous game. I suggested a 10mm. Probably the Glock with a compensated barrel/slide. He does not want to spend $1500 on something.

    I did tell him a .44 mag or .41 mag would be more appropriate in a revolver platform. He is pretty set on a semi-auto. Do you think the 10mm is a good choice for him?
    This year will go down in history.... Don't want to offend anybody
  • #2
    RichardBay
    Member
    • Aug 2013
    • 217

    Yes glock 20 and extra mags

    Comment

    • #3
      NytWolf
      Veteran Member
      • Feb 2010
      • 3935

      For bear, a G20 with a 6" barrel.

      Comment

      • #4
        GW
        I need a LIFE!!
        • May 2004
        • 16078

        Yep
        G-20
        15 round mags
        Buffalo Bore ammo
        sigpicNRA Benefactor Member

        Comment

        • #5
          Click Boom
          Calguns Addict
          • Nov 2013
          • 6955

          G20 with a long flashlight that sticks past the barrel to allow contact shots (maybe).

          Comment

          • #6
            NapalmCheese
            Calguns Addict
            • Feb 2011
            • 5956

            G20 for a full sized gun.

            If he is dead set on porting, he might as well get a G29 (the compact 10mm) and a ported and extended barrel (saving a bit of weight). A 200 or 220 hardcast bullet should do the trick.

            If he is hunting bear with a rifle, then he'll already be carrying a rifle that is literally 'loaded for bear'. If he isn't carrying a rifle the .44 or .41 would be more appropriate, but the 10mm is better than a swift kick to the rear. I mean it's good enough for the Danish Royal Navy Special Forces as polar bear protection.
            Calguns.net, where everyone responding to your post is a Navy Force Delta Recon 6 Sniperator.

            Comment

            • #7
              bwhited
              Senior Member
              • Jun 2009
              • 1947

              He could go with the 45 and shoot 45 super out of it (not modifications needed) so he will get 10mm performance.

              Comment

              • #8
                John Browning
                Calguns Addict
                • May 2006
                • 8089

                10mms is awesome. That said, it is a low end .41 mag and doesn't even come close to a .44mag. With a warm 200gr FMJ load it will do the trick on black bears. It is too light for browns. I will carry my new G20 in the lower 48 unless it is Brown bear country. No need for extra mags, anybody who thinks you will be able to reload is a fool. I have killed bear, I have been charged by them and have seen them inside 10 yards. You will get ONE shot if you need it. If he is carrying a rifle to hunt bear, a pistol might be more of a pain than it is worth unless he won't have the rifle at all times.
                For Sale: Off Roster Handgun Moving Sale

                For Sale: Off Roster CZ, Browning, PTR 91 Moving Sale

                Originally posted by KWalkerM
                eh why bring logic into this, that makes too much sense... besides when you have bested a fool, you have accomplished nothing and he is a fool.

                Comment

                • #9
                  VoxVeritasVita
                  CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                  CGN Contributor
                  • Feb 2013
                  • 676

                  Neither, .454 Casull

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    Fishslayer
                    In Memoriam
                    • Jan 2010
                    • 13035

                    .460 Rowland.

                    I'm hoping this isn't going to be his primary weapon for hunting bear if he's "not much of a handgun guy."
                    "He is your friend, your partner, your defender, your dog.
                    You are his life, his love, his leader. He will be yours, faithful and true, to the last beat of his heart.
                    You owe it to him to be worthy of such devotion."


                    Originally Posted by JackRydden224
                    I hope Ruger pays the extortion fees for the SR1911. I mean the gun is just as good if not better than a Les Baer.
                    Originally posted by redcliff
                    A Colt collector shooting Rugers is like Hugh Grant cheating on Elizabeth Hurley with a hooker.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      SmellOfCordite
                      Senior Member
                      • May 2010
                      • 532

                      ^ this or .44 mag. 10mm is a hot round, and I know you said he was looking into a semi, but if he is truly serious about self defense I would look into a magnum caliber.
                      Автомат Калашникова

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        Click Boom
                        Calguns Addict
                        • Nov 2013
                        • 6955

                        It would suck if one got the drop on you and you were on your back but couldn't get off a shot because the contact pushed the gun out of battery. I've read of people surviving because of contact shots before.

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          Maddawg46
                          Senior Member
                          • Sep 2012
                          • 728

                          Maybe I'll loan him my Ruger .44 mag Alakan. That way he doesn't have to spend a thing other than ammo. I always figured if its for grizzly, you should save one shot for yourself! Suffer less that way. LOL. I think he should probably get some bear spray also.
                          I remember carrying a .41 mag SW years ago in Wyoming. After two days hiking around the pistol would get left in the truck.....too heavy with a rifle and all the other stuff you have to lug around.
                          This year will go down in history.... Don't want to offend anybody

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            HUTCH 7.62
                            In Memoriam
                            • Aug 2006
                            • 11298

                            No poll???? OP fail
                            Some say that he once mooned two prostitutes just for a round of drinks, but wasn't surprised by the reply......They call him, the Hutch
                            Some say that he rode a dirtbike 7k miles across the country and that he once applied Bengay to his own testicles for a mere $50............They call him, the Hutch -Top Gear

                            http://media.liveauctiongroup.net/i/...CCAB7CE8D70F60

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              mif_slim
                              I need a LIFE!!
                              • Apr 2008
                              • 10089

                              Because dropping your primary firearm to draw your side arm is way quicker than aiming your primary at the charging bear.

                              Seriously though, i carry a handgun for two-legged creatures. For that, a 9mm will do or whatever your friend has.

                              If a bear ever decides to rush you, just know that you wont even have time to aim your primary let alone draw your secondary. I witness a charging bear just this pass archery season and they are as fast as a drag car coming out the gates. By the time i thought about what to do, it was 60+ yards away from where i saw it.
                              Originally posted by Gottmituns
                              It's not protecting the rights of the 1%, it's IMPOSING new laws because of the 1%.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1