"Beretta USA Presents Next Generation Handgun to the Department of Defense"

[k1dude]

More Powerful? 9mm ball ammo is plenty powerful.

Not according to the Army.

[Standard]

Looks nice, I'd buy one. I love Berettas, and don't mind the safety at all.
Most complaints about the safety come from people who started out with a 1911 style safety and have to adapt to something different. For those of us who didn't, it's no problem. You just press forward, they way your thumbs go anyway, and it flicks off.
Also, the safety is a mil requirement, so no **** it's not a G model.

[Dagostino480]

So the modular grip should be interchangable with my 92a1 hopefully. I thought they would make the px4 SOCOM into the next army gun.

[tuna quesadilla]

Also, the safety is a mil requirement, so no **** it's not a G model.

Insider information says that it's actually a convertible lever like the PX4s and Cougars. Of course the military is going to issue it in the FS configuration but if it's anything like the PX4, it is stupid easy to switch over to G.

[customiiguy]

Im very excited as a beretta fan.. slim grips..replaceable front and rear sights. Fde.. rail... wat more do u want?

[perpetual otter]

Im very excited as a beretta fan.. slim grips..replaceable front and rear sights. Fde.. rail... wat more do u want?

We already said what we want. A "G" model!

[tuna quesadilla]

We already said what we want. A "G" model!

Beretta already revived the 92G this year. Bud's has them in stock as we speak. I own one.

It's just not on the roster so most Californians can't buy it now that SSE is closed.

Beretta didn't even bother packaging a 10-round magazine version of the 92G, whereas they do in fact sell the 92FS, M9, and M9A1 with separate catalog numbers for the 10-round versions.

California sucks.

[steelciocc]

M9A3 will be user configurable for F or G.

See the point-paper: http://www.mediafire.com/download/2v...Release.v1.pdf