..........................
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
..........................
Collapse
X
-
Yes, those are the only two parts you need, but technically, you could in fact continue using the existing spring plug. You can and should continue using the existing spring. -
Will changing to the "gi" style guide rod have any performance benefits/negatives over the FLGR? Or is it just personal preference?
Thanks again!Comment
-
Aside from eliminating the need to use a tool to disassemble the pistol, which is beneficial in itself, there are no positives or negatives.
The use of a FLGR has been subject to quite a bit of debate over the years.Comment
-
On a side note, when I had a Springfield Loaded years ago, I recall an instance where I disassembled the pistol following a day at the range, and the FLGR was loose. If you search, you will certainly hear about instances where shooters lost the end of a FLGR downrange. Under those circumstances, the pistol will likely continue to function, but there's a risk in having the spring bind against the exposed threads on the guiderod.
As always, your mileage may vary.Comment
-
I used almost the exact same parts for my TRP. Springfield's two piece guide rod is a horrible design. Nothing wrong with a guide rod in a 1911 if you want one, but it needs to be solid.Im a warmonger baby, I got blood in my eyes and I'm looking at you.Comment
-
Also it makes it so you can cycle the action on a table top, side of your shoe, etc...
First thing I did when I got my 1911, replace the FLGR with a GI rod and plug.-POLICESTATE,
In the name of the State, and of the School, and of the Infallible Science
sigpic
Government Official Lies
. F r e e d o m . D i e s .Comment
-
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~ Benjamin FranklinComment
-
I just purchased a TRP and the first thing I did was order the same Wilson Guide Rod. However I went with the 10-8 plug http://www.10-8performance.com/produ...ring-Plug.html really just because I like the concave look over the Wilson.
I am only doing it for easy take down. From what I have read performance is not really an issue, though some people prefer the weight of a FLGR.Comment
-
I never really got the big issue with FLGR's. I do see the ease of takedown with no tools required, but for me it was never a big deal. However, I carry my 1911 alot on the family ranch and at one point my FLGR came apart and the front half was lost to the dirt. I just replaced the spring plug with a closed end one to keep dirt out and never looked back. My guide rod was internally threaded though, so no binding issues with the recoil spring. Apparently springfield was smart enough to make the base portion of the rod the same size a GI type rodComment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,870,526
Posts: 25,173,064
Members: 358,862
Active Members: 5,370
Welcome to our newest member, 1776 Arms.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 15197 users online. 145 members and 15052 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 11:39 PM on 02-14-2026.

Comment