Will todays Supreme Court ruling effect familial transfers here in Calif?
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supreme Court Rulling
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Abramski is being discussed in the National 2A forum (even though this is not a 2A case).
Answer: I don't see why it would. In-state intrafamilial transfer does not use an FFL, so no 4473, no Federal issue,
See the thread there.ARCHIVED Calguns Foundation Wiki here: http://web.archive.org/web/201908310...itle=Main_Page
Frozen in 2015, it is falling out of date and I can no longer edit the content. But much of it is still good!
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,854,543
Posts: 24,996,531
Members: 353,086
Active Members: 6,211
Welcome to our newest member, kylejimenez932.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 11174 users online. 190 members and 10984 guests.
Most users ever online was 65,177 at 7:20 PM on 09-21-2024.
Comment